Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-27 Thread Jon Crowcroft
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], "J. Noel Chiappa" typed: right, noels wrong. Noel is happy to wait, and see who's right. (I've been through this exact same experience before, with CLNP, so I understand the life-cycle.) So far, I've been waiting for quite a few years with IPv6, and so

Re: runumbering (was: Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated?)

2000-04-27 Thread Randall Stewart
Ok, I will stop being a lurker and chime in since our draft was mentioned :- Stephen Sprunk wrote: draft-xie-stewart-sigtran-ddp-00 addresses redundancy and failover of sessions within a server pool, where uncoordinated failover of sessions from one endpoint to another is a requirement.

RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-27 Thread BookIII, Robert
This may be a divergence from the topic, so I'll apologize in advance, but Vernon's point about bounced emails struck a cord with me. I made the mistake of leaving a couple of options on my MS Outlook which causes a receipt to be sent back to me when an email is delivered and when it's read. At

RE: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-27 Thread Vernon Schryver
From: "BookIII, Robert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] ... save for a couple of auto-responses from NTMail in the name of ... but have started up again. Does anyone know how I could go about addressing this? Thanks for your time and consideration. You can expect at least 3 and usually several more

Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt

2000-04-27 Thread J. Noel Chiappa
From: Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] You appear to be saying that because historically people screwed up configuring their DNS that it is impossible to rely on the DNS for critical infrastructure. I wouldn't say 'impossible'. My point is that it is more difficult to