Steve Deering; > >Unfortunately, IPv6's current addressing architecture makes it very > >difficult to do this sort of traditional multihoming if one is not > >IPv6's larger address space is merely a necessary piece of an > >Internet which will not run out of numbers. > > Wow, we actually agree on something! (Though I could quibble over the > "merely".) As you two seemingly have agreed, IPv6, as is, is not so useful for scalable multihoming. However, transition to IPv6 is important to solve multihoming issues, because IPv6 routing space is not yet polluted by unaggregated addresses. Important pieces are documented in <draft-ohta-e2e-multihoming-00.txt> The Architecture of End to End Multihoming just become available. Masataka Ohta
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeat... Keith Moore
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeat... John Stracke
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeat... Steve Deering
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeat... George Michaelson
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Andrew Partan
- Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated? Joe Touch
- correction Re: IPv6: Past mistakes repeated... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Sean Doran
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Steve Deering
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.tx... Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.tx... John Stracke
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Masataka Ohta
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Andrew Partan
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.tx... Paul Ferguson
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.tx... Keith Moore
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.txt Thomas Narten
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-02.tx... Bill Manning
- Re: draft-ietf-nat-protocol-complications-0... Steve Deering