At 12:40 24.05.2000 +, Dawson, Peter D wrote:
So the "unverified accusation" ... should become "verifiable" and this
could only be possible if there is a code of ethics between noc/isp etc...
i.e just what I suggested in my earlier posting...
RFC 2350 and draft-ietf-grip-isp-expectations, and
Hi,
If its only IP address, use RARP mechanism to get the IP address (this
requires a rarp server to be in place in the same network). RARP server can
be enabled in the Linux server. If RARP fails(after some timeout), then go
ahead to use Bootp to get the IP address.
Regards
M.Ravichandran
Mark Paton writes:
The IETF does a great job and does'nt deserve or
warrent this attack. The people who deserve it
are the politicians who are trying to implement
"laws" on the use of the InterNet, have a go at
them and leave this group alone.
Hate to belabour a point that is probably
Who is the host?
Where can i find more info?
Matt Morrisey
At 11:10 25-05-00 , Ravichandran M wrote:
Hi,
If its only IP address, use RARP mechanism to get the IP address (this
requires a rarp server to be in place in the same network). RARP server can
be enabled in the Linux server. If RARP fails(after some timeout), then go
ahead to use Bootp to get the
Is there a GRIP online email archive ??
details about all ietf wgs are on the ietf web site, http://ietf.org/.
grip's in particular is http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/grip-charter.html.
randy
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2000 1:55 PM
To: Dawson, Peter D
Cc: 'IETF general mailing list'
Subject: RE: Privacy (RE: Should IETF do more to fight computer crime?)
Is there a GRIP online email archive ??
details about all
Hi,
A recent thread suggested something interesting - an average Ethernet/IP
packet length of 500 bytes. Has there been any work done in the area of
finding average packet lengths, bandwidth usage, etc. of typical (read:
unknown) networks? Are there any "rules of thumb" values that are
I am seeking a few points of
clarification:
1. Fibre Channel folks have attempted to
explain to me why TCP/IP could NEVER be a viable interconnect for block level
storage operations. They claim:
a. TCP is too CPU intensive and creates too
much latency for storage I/O operations.
b. The
The asynchronous audio conferencing applet at www.wimba.com
uses TCP ports 4382 and 5644.
Sites wishing to explore Wimba will need to allow access for
TCP transmissions on those ports. Those concerned regarding
security issues should note that the signed applet has been
ranked in the top 1%
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Jon William Toigo wrote:
I am seeking a few points of clarification:
1. Fibre Channel folks have attempted to explain to me why TCP/IP
could NEVER be a viable interconnect for block level storage
operations. They claim:
a. TCP is too CPU intensive and creates too
Thanks for the feedback, Mssrs. Fisk and Nagle,
I think a problem for IT folks who are hearing early statements about SANs
based on GE has to do with an issue to which you both alluded.
Specifically, what parameters -- bandwidth, throughput, latency, etc. --
must designers consider when
Title: RE: Average Ethernet packet length
I saw an article a while back that showed spikes at 64 bytes (TCP handshake, increased with web growth), 590 bytes (576 byte min mtu), and 1518 bytes (Ethernet max). This was a few years old. I don't know if it listed an average. I'll try to dig it
In message CC96542306D7D2119E0B080009EB58FE9582FA@MERCURY, Timothy Behne writ
es:
Hi,
A recent thread suggested something interesting - an average Ethernet/IP
packet length of 500 bytes. Has there been any work done in the area of
finding average packet lengths, bandwidth usage, etc. of
At 22:52 25-05-00 , Jon William Toigo wrote:
c. The maximum throughput of a GE TCP/IP connection is 768 Mps, which is
too slow to support storage I/O operations.
Provably false. In fact TCP throughput above 768 Mbps over 1518-byte GE
has been demonstrated publicly in the past in several
On Thu, 25 May 2000 21:08:19 -0400, "Steven M. Bellovin" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
There are no good, current studies on LAN behavior that I've seen.
However, many LAN switches can provide this information to a
management process. With high-speed networks, this may be the only
way to get
16 matches
Mail list logo
