Re: scum suckers (was Re: Bottom feeders:-)

2000-12-27 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I hate to argue with Randy's common sense but I don't think this works. There are always people who can't get travel authorisation until very late, or whatever, among those who are absolutely needed (i.e. document authors etc.). So we would need rules about who gets in regardless of the limit,

Re: www.ietf.org advertising isoc

2000-12-27 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Lloyd, There is nothing on the IETF (or ISOC) web site suggesting that ISOC membership is required, so what is your problem? Since the ISOC funds the RFC Editor and provides a budget at the disposal of the IETF Chair, not to mention providing vital legal insurance, a pointer (which is actually

Re: scum suckers (was Re: Bottom feeders:-)

2000-12-27 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Wed, 27 Dec 2000 14:52:19 -0600 From:Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I hate to argue with Randy's common sense but I don't think this | works. There are always people who can't get travel authorisation | until very late,

Re: scum suckers (was Re: Bottom feeders:-)

2000-12-27 Thread Henning Schulzrinne
Workshops with restricted attendance often seem to have a two-tiered policy: authors/panelists first, rest later on a space-available basis. This unfortunately, for the IETF, has obvious gaming potential which the I-D editor is not likely to appreciate. Relying on drafts to be discussed at a WG

Re: scum suckers (was Re: Bottom feeders:-)

2000-12-27 Thread Vernon Schryver
Randy Bush wrote: ... the goal is not to become large, the goal is to maintain quality but one does not want to disenfranchise any particular constituency so nangog gets space for about 500 people, allows just that many to register, and it's first register first serve.

Re: scum suckers (was Re: Bottom feeders:-)

2000-12-27 Thread Randy Bush
I hate to argue with Randy's common sense but I don't think this works. There are always people who can't get travel authorisation until very late, or whatever, among those who are absolutely needed (i.e. document authors etc.). So we would need rules about who gets in regardless of the

Re: Enanito si, pero con que pedazo!

2000-12-27 Thread Denis Mcmahon
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000 10:51:49 -0800, you wrote: My corporate mail system with virus scanning says that this mail (may have had an attachment) is infected. I hope, you haven't become a victim. I understand from comments elsewhere that it's a nasty little beast that hooks to the winsock looking

Re: Welcoming newcomers

2000-12-27 Thread Ofer Inbar
I'm not a newcomer, but I don't go to meetings very often. I joined the IETF list in 1990 and have participated in some WGs on and off since then, but in that whole time I think I've attended only 5 IETF meetings. So, in the stats the secretariat keeps, I don't know if I show up as a repeat,