N:N multicast with extra address space?

2001-04-18 Thread Hugh Fisher
I'm building applications for collaborative 3D graphics using SRM (actually LRMP) multicast on the local Ethernet. They're peer to peer systems, not in the new buzzword of the day sense, but in all being equal participants rather than a client/server design. My systems have multiple sender

RE: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Philip J. Nesser II
> IANA: Unless you can find some evidence of implementation, please > retire the IP protocol number 5 assignment as Historical. James, Things might have been so informal 10, 20, or 30 years ago, but the IANA doesn't usually take such actions when someone randomly shoots them off an email. If y

Re: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread James P. Salsman
> For that matter, is anyboy using 'ST Datagram', or is v5 also > recoverable for re-use? According to IEN 119 -- ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/ien/ien-119.txt.1 -- of 7 September 1979: ] The state of the protocol is such that, while there are ] still details to be worked out, implementati

RE: Information please! 3G - 3GPP - GPRS - UMTS

2001-04-18 Thread Austin Bill-P23393
http://www.3gpp.org http://www.3gpp2.org http://www.etsi.org http:// www.umts-forum.org/ and http://www.palowireless.com/3g/ Bill Austin http://

RE: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Tony Hain
Jiwoong wrote: > One quick question: Why IPv1-IPv3 left untouched ? check out RFC 762 : http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0762.txt?number=762

Re: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Bob Braden
*> *> One quick question: Why IPv1-IPv3 left untouched ? *> *> Jiwoong *> *> They are available but not untouched. IP versions 1, 2, and 3 were used during the initial research phase for the Internet protocols, roughly 1977 - 1980. (I am a little fuzzy about 3... I believe that

Re: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Lionel Gauliardon
Please : in France un POISSON d'avril ... Be careful you made a mistake in your sentence ... ;-) To women and men who have a great memory. - Original Message - From: "Jon Crowcroft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "glen.morehead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Jiwoong Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ietf"

Re: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:27:09 BST, Jon Crowcroft said: > of course, > IPv5 is alive OK then.. IANA - *DONT* reclaim the IPv5 protocol type ;) /Valdis

Information please! 3G - 3GPP - GPRS - UMTS

2001-04-18 Thread Nikki Cranley
Hi, Sorry if this is the wrong place for this but I was wondering if there are some good links/sites for an introductory technical overview on 3G, GPRS, 3GPP and UMTS!   Thanks a million, rgds, Nikki

Re: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Jon Crowcroft
for those of you in the US april fools day dates from the introduction of the gregorian calendar in the 16th century, and invovled moving the start of the year from apr 1 to jan 1 in france, a posson d'avril is a rather nice phrase for a person who is subject of one of these (supposed harmless)

Re: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 11:34:57 +0900, Jiwoong Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > What fun! I've heard a lot about IPv5, but it's first time to see IPv9! > > It seems that IPv6-IPv9 appeared as solutions to IPv4 address shortcoming, > as indicated IAB Routing and Addressing Task Force. Am I right ? I

RE: IPv9 ??

2001-04-18 Thread Glen Morehead
For those of you outside the U.S. (and, I suppose, parts of Europe), April 1 is known as April Fool's Day. People play practical jokes on each other; some of them are rather elaborate and created just for April Fool's. If you scan back through the RFC index, there are well over a dozen RFCs publ

mgcp

2001-04-18 Thread ashokkp
1) tell me the mgcp packet format 2) how the conferencing is made in the mgcp 3) whether the sdp is used in the mgcp , why it is used pls clear this doubt thanx in advance ashok -Original Message- From: vint cerf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 2 April 2001 4:19 PM To: R.Z. Pan;