On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:14:16PM -0800,
Bill Strahm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 64 lines which said:
Saying that WG chairs can not work for companies that need the
efforts of the WG seems like setting up a big failure,
Valdis did not suggest that we *forbid* people to work for
Suresh,
As for the comment from John Moy (circa July 2001) about the
availability of an inter-area OSPF draft, I do recall responding
that the inter-area draft was assuming additive properties to
TE metrics to advertise summary info. It is a mistake to assume
that all TE metrics
Topic: Object-Oriented Database Management System
Query Language using URI syntax.
Let me tell about this task in brief. My co-workers and I develop
Object-Oriented DBMS and network protocol for it. It is not usual
DBMS because it is based not so much on the data storage as on the
On Thursday, Dec 19, 2002, at 06:12 America/Montreal, 'Stephane
Bortzmeyer' wrote:
Valdis did not suggest that we *forbid* people to work for companies
involved in the work of the WG they chair. Just that we ask them to
*disclose* such potential conflicts of interest. (BTW, in the
present case,
I agree with the notion that all folks in positions of perceived
power (e.g. IAB, IESG, WG Chairs, IRTF Chair) should be required to
disclose publicly all of their relationships (e.g. employment,
presence on other Internet-related positions such as board of a
registry, technical
... snip
Please look at draft-kompella-mpls-multiarea-te-03.txt, as
at least some of the approaches described in that draft
do *not* assume additive properties of TE metrics (and do not
advertise summary info).
Yakov.
Yakov - You are right. The draft does talk about
Suresh,
Please look at draft-kompella-mpls-multiarea-te-03.txt, as
at least some of the approaches described in that draft
do *not* assume additive properties of TE metrics (and do not
advertise summary info).
Yakov.
Yakov - You are right. The draft does talk about
At 07:43 PM 12/19/02 +0200, Timur Shemsedinov wrote:
Using all URL components together:
/Root.**.Name!mask*:Class#Field1,Field2,Field3?Field45;Field5=ABCD
I purposely use # before ? because field list specification is
logically follows path component.
I suggest you review this:
Hi -
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 10:03:34 -0800 (PST)
From: Rick Wesson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: RJ Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Stephane Bortzmeyer' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC Summary: AXFR clarify
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, RJ Atkinson wrote:
...
I agree with the notion that all folks in positions of perceived power
(e.g. IAB, IESG, WG Chairs, IRTF Chair) should be required to disclose
publicly
all of their relationships (e.g. employment, presence on other
Internet-related
YMMV, but I've found that even when folks truly believe they
are speaking as individuals, their thinking may nonetheless
be influenced by their company's business model and technology
focus. Our knowledge of requirements is strongly influenced by
the customers we talk to.
I don't think
11 matches
Mail list logo
