Yes, the mp3 streaming seems to be a very useful tool to open up for
off-site participation. Compared to having a jabber chat room, it is
much easier to follow what happens, as even a very good scribe can
not possible capture everything that happens. Also, it is not easy
to find someone who is
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 12:23 -0500, Tony Hansen wrote:
Kudos for the mp3 streams!
So far, the mp3 streams have been quite a success. From the feedback
I've heard, the audio quality has been mostly excellent. When combined
with the xmpp/jabber rooms, we have a two way communication path, and
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 12:23 -0500, Tony Hansen wrote:
Kudos for the mp3 streams!
So far, the mp3 streams have been quite a success. From the feedback
I've heard, the audio quality has been mostly excellent. When combined
with the xmpp/jabber rooms, we have
Date: 2005-03-08 23:17
From: Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I read the post you referenced above, as well as the followups from Ned and
Scott, and I have nothing to add to their explanations. I think that they
have accurately described the situation at hand.
[...]
As has been explained to
--On 10. mars 2005 07:50 -0800 Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In our draft you'll see that we're pretty explicit in that our goal is to
build a service that is light-weight enough that it can be provided at a
very low cost, and across all the meetings. nothwithstanding any other
At 12:17 PM 3/10/2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
--On 10. mars 2005 07:50 -0800 Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In our draft you'll see that we're pretty explicit in that our goal is to
build a service that is light-weight enough that it can be provided at a
very low cost, and across
I think that a short BCP or the equivalent for jabber scribing
would make sense, as not everyone is familiar with the technology.
As a frequent scribe, I suspect that scribing and jabber could be
combined for open meetings (and might improve the scribing), but
1 minute after the start of the
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I think that a short BCP or the equivalent for jabber scribing
would make sense, as not everyone is familiar with the technology.
As a frequent scribe, I suspect that scribing and jabber could be
combined for open meetings (and might improve the
As someone who's been beating the drum for remote attendance for some
time, I have to say the audio setup this time was outstanding. I was
only able to listen in on a limited number of sessions, but that was
enough for me to hear the discussion on a draft I'm working on. Video
would not have
Several of the WGs I'm in only use a jabber scribe, and it's worked
well. If there's a network glitch, you have a few options: continue
writing your notes locally and post the series to jabber once you
reestablish connectivity, or play tag team with someone else who hasn't
lost connectivity.
The slides for today's plenary presentation about HIP RG
activities are available at
http://www.tml.hut.fi/~pnr/presentations/IETF62-Plenary-HIP-RG-05-03
-10.pdf
--Pekka Nikander
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
We found a mobile phone in the Rochester room at 4:45pm. It has a Japanese
user interface.
We left it with Hotel Security at the front desk.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 6:23 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'iab@iab.org'; 'iesg@ietf.org'
Cc: 'ietf@ietf.org'
Subject: Why?
Why are we wasting effort in every WG and research area on NAT traversal
crap???
All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[ Note, I'm replying from my personal address because that's how I'm
subscribed to the list for hysterical raisins. ]
Bruce Lilly wrote:
| The issue is not the appearance of registrations prior to final
| publication of an RFC, but rather the usability
Tony Hain wrote:
Why are we wasting effort in every WG and research area on NAT traversal
crap???
FWIW I'm also concerned that we are doing too many different NAT
traversal protocols. It should be sufficient to just define how IPv6 is
tunneled across NATs and start using more IPv6 in the
Hi,
I will like to ask the responsible/s of setting up the IETF network to make
sure that we don't have again, a situation like we had this week, when the
network was not working most of the time, and no IPv6 available.
There was already some problems in the last IETF, and it seems to me that
I agree with others that the audio service added a new dimension to remote
participation. In some groups I'm involved with we've had folks regularly
participating via text chat, and it seems to me that their interaction was
higher-bandwidth because they could get the audio in more or less real
The IESG has received a request from the Session Initiation Protocol WG to
consider the following documents:
- 'Actions addressing identified issues with the Session Initiation Protocol's
non-INVITE Transaction '
draft-sparks-sip-nit-actions-03.txt as a Proposed Standard
- 'Problems
18 matches
Mail list logo
