On Jan 8, 2006, at 2:24 AM, Yaakov Stein wrote:
I'd suggest requiring that the image format be GIF,
since it's simple, stable, well documented, widely supported in both
freeware and commercial software,
and the patents have expired.
Actually that is not quite right YET.
There are patents
While I personally like PDF for many things, I find PDF to be a poor
choice for IETF works-in-progress,
or even for RFCs because they lack many of the characteristics that
ASCII files offer.
Don't you mean that ASCII lacks many of the features PDF offers
(font faces, font styles, diagrams,
--On Sunday, 08 January, 2006 14:42 +0200 Yaakov Stein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I personally like PDF for many things, I find PDF to be
a poor
choice for IETF works-in-progress,
or even for RFCs because they lack many of the
characteristics that
ASCII files offer.
Don't you mean
On Jan 6, 2006, at 09:02, Sandy Wills wrote:
This is not a change; this seems to be the way the IETF works.
Many group gatherings work the same way; to me its an intuitive way
of getting any/all objections brought up, or establishing that
there aren't any, after a period of free
Ken Raeburn wrote:
This is not a change; this seems to be the way the IETF works.
Many group gatherings work the same way; to me its an intuitive way
of getting any/all objections brought up, or establishing that there
aren't any, after a period of free discussion.
If it's not a
