--On Wednesday, June 17, 2009 10:47 -0400 "Joel M. Halpern"
wrote:
> I really think we want to stay away from any statement which
> implies anything about the nominees views about anyone.
> I do not think it is reasonable or practical to try to include
> disclaimers in the list of nominees abou
Joel M. Halpern wrote:
I really think we want to stay away from any statement which implies
anything about the nominees views about anyone.
I do not think it is reasonable or practical to try to include
disclaimers in the list of nominees about eveyr misapprehension that
readers of the list may
I really think we want to stay away from any statement which implies
anything about the nominees views about anyone.
I do not think it is reasonable or practical to try to include
disclaimers in the list of nominees about eveyr misapprehension that
readers of the list may form.
We ought not be m
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Something like: "This is the list of those
nominated (or self-nominated) for IESG positions. The
nominees have said that they're willing to serve if
selected, but there is no implication that they consider
the incumbent unsuited for re-appointment."
Presumably there wo
While I hate commenting on pure process issues there's
one aspect of this that I don't think I've seen mentioned.
(Apologies if this is a repeat.)
I've been nominated a number of times and have agreed to
go forward, but when filling in the form have said something
like: "If you're willing to pick
--On Friday, June 05, 2009 16:45 -0700 The IESG
wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter
> to consider the following document:
>
> - 'Nominating Committee Process: Open Disclosure of Willing
> Nominees ' as a BCP
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the ne
