Re: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshima venue?)

Yes. I checked Sept 14-18. Try it yourself, I expect you'll get the same results... Lou On 9/4/2009 7:32 AM, Andrew G. Malis wrote: Lou, Does that online rate you saw include in-room Internet, service charges, and taxes? Those are included in the IETF rate. Cheers, Andy On Thu, Sep

Re: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshima venue?)

Lou, Does that online rate you saw include in-room Internet, service charges, and taxes? Those are included in the IETF rate. Cheers, Andy On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Lou Bergerlber...@labn.net wrote: Out of curiosity, why is the IETF rate ~2000Y higher than their standard internet room

Re: IETF Trust response to the appeal by John C Klensin (July 18, 2009

Without taking positions on the specifics of the appeal or the response, I have to say that my take on the response is that it doesn't properly address the appeal and is inadequate. I would have expected the specific issues raised in the appeal to be responded to in a direct manner, with a clear

Re: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshima venue?)

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:43:15AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: Yes. I checked Sept 14-18. Try it yourself, I expect you'll get the same results... I don't understand why the rate during another period is relevant to the rate we might get. Remember that hotels, like everyone else, charge more

Re: IETF Trust response to the appeal by John C Klensin (July 18, 2009

The entire response has been posted to the tlp-interest list Why wasn't it send to the ISS? It may be easier ... Please copy the response to the IETF list Thanks ___ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshima venue?)

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Andrew Sullivan wrote: On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:43:15AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: Yes. I checked Sept 14-18. Try it yourself, I expect you'll get the same results... I don't understand why the rate during another period is relevant to the rate we might get. Remember

RE: Hiroshima room rates (was Re: Non-smoking rooms at the Hiroshimavenue?)

David Morris wrote: || On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Andrew Sullivan wrote: || ||| On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:43:15AM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: Yes. I checked Sept 14-18. Try it yourself, I expect you'll get the same results... ||| ||| I don't understand why the rate during another period is

The methodology/guideline of mathematical re-definition of constitution or legal/law

Dear experts, A protocol is a kinds of law. I've just found out the new conceptual methodology/guideline for mathematical re-definition of constitution or legal/law. How do you think? I Request for comments. PEOPLE ARE CONSIDERING THE RESULT OF TODAY, FOR SEEKING THE ANSWER OF NEXT DAY.

Protocol Action: 'OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication' to Proposed Standard

The IESG has approved the following document: - 'OSPFv2 HMAC-SHA Cryptographic Authentication ' draft-ietf-ospf-hmac-sha-07.txt as a Proposed Standard This document is the product of the Open Shortest Path First IGP Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Ross Callon and Adrian Farrel.

RFC 5681 on TCP Congestion Control

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5681 Title: TCP Congestion Control Author: M. Allman, V. Paxson, E. Blanton Status: Standards Track Date: September 2009

RFC 5645 on Update to the Language Subtag Registry

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 5645 Title: Update to the Language Subtag Registry Author: D. Ewell, Ed. Status: Informational Date: September 2009 Mailbox:

BCP 47, RFC 5646 on Tags for Identifying Languages

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. BCP 47 RFC 5646 Title: Tags for Identifying Languages Author: A. Phillips, Ed., M. Davis, Ed. Status: Best Current Practice Date: