Date:Thu, 24 Dec 2009 08:50:30 +0200
From:Roni Even ron.even@gmail.com
Message-ID: 4b33100a.01135e0a.2ab9.8...@mx.google.com
| I am not sure but are you suggesting that the IETF will define the
| requirements, metric and quality assessment requirements and
Hi,
In line
Roni Even
-Original Message-
From: k...@munnari.oz.au [mailto:k...@munnari.oz.au]
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 11:47 AM
To: Roni Even
Cc: 'Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)'; i...@ietf.org;
ietf@ietf.org; co...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG Review: Internet Wideband
There is a very high cost to service providers every time a new codec
is introduced operationally, at the very least in the form of
full-mesh transcoding. Thus, new codecs should not be developed
lightly.
As I think we can all agree, the world already has enough encumbered
codecs, and there's no
All IETF mailing list seem to now require this %!$# confirmation procedure.
This particular message was rather ironic; I was sending a request to
postmas...@ietf.org! Who decided to implement this filtering, and why did
they do such a poor job of it?
Whose
-Original Message-
From:
Total of 81 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Dec 25 00:53:02 EST 2009
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
4.94% |4 | 6.42% |30110 | o...@ogud.com
4.94% |4 | 5.67% |26606 | hal...@gmail.com
