Gosh, we managed to have that entire discussion without a single person
comparing it to emacs vs vi.
oopsie.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.dewrote:
On 28.12.2010 18:26, Martin Rex wrote:
...
Everyone who looks at writing I-Ds should seriously consider
Time for a BCP?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/29/technology/29wifi.html?_r=1nl=todaysheadlinesemc=tha25
The problem is that Wi-Fi was never intended for large halls and thousands of
people, many of them bristling with an arsenal of laptops,
I don't recall seeing a document on this and
On Dec 29, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Time for a BCP?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/29/technology/29wifi.html?_r=1nl=todaysheadlinesemc=tha25
The problem is that Wi-Fi was never intended for large halls and thousands of
people, many of them bristling with an arsenal of
Dave,
I think you will find that our NOC people have a great deal of
experience and perhaps even a list of do's and don'ts for this type of
design. In the end, this technology will not scale without bonds if
we're talking about n-thousand people sitting in a plenary hall, but
there are
I'm curious what the largest *successful* deployment has been (measured in
number of participants in a single room/hall/stadium/...) that anybody has
seen, within the IETF or beyond. The NYC article hints at the fact that the
limit may be hotel fiber, rather than wireless, in some cases. We
The best conference WiFi experience I had ever with was the SIGCOMM'07
conference room in Kyoto International Conference Center
http://www.icckyoto.or.jp/ in Kyoto, Japan. It showed nearly no
service interruption for my laptop. It might be interesting to learn
from our Japanese colleagues how
Jonny Martin did a nice little lightning talk on the topic at APNIC 29:
http://meetings.apnic.net/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/19020/Lightning-Talk_09_Jonny-Martin-APRICOT2010-wifi-network.pdf
On Dec 29, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
Dave,
I think you will find that our NOC
On 12/29/10 8:03 AM, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
I'm curious what the largest *successful* deployment has been
(measured in number of participants in a single
room/hall/stadium/...) that anybody has seen, within the IETF or
beyond. The NYC article hints at the fact that the limit may be hotel
On Dec 29, 2010, at 8:38 AM, Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
On 12/29/10 8:03 AM, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
I'm curious what the largest *successful* deployment has been
(measured in number of participants in a single
room/hall/stadium/...) that anybody has seen, within the IETF or
Hi Folks,
whilst everyone is on the topic of WiFi ...
Now that the meeting in the PRC is over, is there any
intention to continue the WiFi authentication shenanigans?
[802.1X stuff, entering the magic number on your badge, ...]
That seemed to be another added complexity @ Maastricht, so
I'd
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
I'm curious what the largest *successful* deployment has been (measured
in number of participants in a single room/hall/stadium/...) that
anybody has seen, within the IETF or beyond. The NYC article hints at
the fact that the limit may be
I would suggest having it written by Austria Telecom and WIDE.
On Dec 29, 2010, at 7:14 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Time for a BCP?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/29/technology/29wifi.html?_r=1nl=todaysheadlinesemc=tha25
The problem is that Wi-Fi was never intended for large halls and
Julian Reschke wrote:
On 28.12.2010 18:26, Martin Rex wrote:
...
Everyone who looks at writing I-Ds should seriously consider looking
at NRoffEdit before deciding which document format and tool to use.
...
Everyone who looks at writing I-Ds should also seriously consider
xml2rfc.
Hi -
From: Martin Rex m...@sap.com
To: Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; barryle...@computer.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: Automatically updated Table of Contents with Nroff
...
I tried to use xml2rfc once and gave up after 3 hours of
Martin Rex wrote:
Everyone who looks at writing I-Ds should also seriously consider
xml2rfc. :-)
Only if he is in for a lot of pain and trouble...
I used xml2rfc (the online version, not installing it) to write RFC 4645
and 5646, including numerous drafts, without any significant pain or
15 matches
Mail list logo
