Cher Michel,
2011/8/20 Michel Py mic...@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us
[trimmed the cross-post To... field]
John,
In case it was not clear, I encourage you do consider who you are
dealing with on this issue: the sock puppets of JFC Morfin. These
individuals are well-known
as Jefsey's
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document:
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
+1, which is to say:
- I've read it
- I agree with what it says
- I can't find any reason not to move it to Full Standard
- Nice job all around
Well said, so +1 for all of the above.
One pedantic nit:
8.4. Transfer Encode
The MSA MAY apply transfer encoding
At 11:33 19-08-2011, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Internet Area Working Group WG
(intarea) to consider the following document:
- 'IPv6 Support Required for all IP-capable nodes'
draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a
Hi Subramanian,
I think most of your comments will be dealt with by
wordsmithing, but...
On 2011-08-21 06:11, SM wrote:
...
From Section 2:
'Updates [RFC1812], especially sections 1, 2, and 4 which use the
generic IP synonymously with the more specific IPv4. Since
RFC1812 is an
Dear colleagues,
I did not read the rest of the message past what I quote below, becase
it did not seem to me that the structure of the message would answer
the question I pose. Therefore, I make a request:
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 01:08:29AM +0200, jefsey wrote:
However, the Internet MUST be
