Hi Brian,
At 16:49 20-08-2011, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I think most of your comments will be dealt with by
wordsmithing, but...
See comments below.
It't quite clear to me, but we could spell it out: s/IP/IPv4/.
That's clearer.
Yes it does. It clarifies, for consumer organizations for
On 2011-08-21 19:02, SM wrote:
Hi Brian,
...
IPv6 node requirements are defined in RFC 4294. It's merely an
informative reference in draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01. The
discussion about IPV4 address pool exhaustion (Section 1) is a
distraction from a definition of an IP-capable node.
