Hi John,
On 9/9/12 8:43 PM, John Levine wrote:
Let's say I write to the IESG and say this:
Due to a late night editing error, draft-foo-bar-42 which I
submitted yesterday contains several paragraphs of company
confidential information which you can easily see are irrelevant to
the
Michael Richardson {quigon} m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Let me suggest that at the IETF, where the mailing list is king, you
can't join the Elite if you can't quote email properly. Maybe we should
*state* this.
:-)
Maybe I'm also concerned because many in the former elite have moved
to Apple
If someone wants to provide guidance on how to do a least bad job
with Outlook, that will be gratefully received. But advice that says
don't use Outlook will be filed with the advice that says pick
another employer to work for.
--
Christopher Dearlove
Senior Principal Engineer, Communications
On Sep 10, 2012, at 12:46, Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
chris.dearl...@baesystems.com wrote:
If someone wants to provide guidance on how to do a least bad job
with Outlook, that will be gratefully received.
I'm not an expert for this, but, as far as I am aware of, it has not been
possible to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/10/2012 03:46 AM, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) wrote:
If someone wants to provide guidance on how to do a least bad job with
Outlook, that will be gratefully received. But advice that says don't use
Outlook will be filed with the advice that
The first week of November dates for 2018, 2021 and 2022 are likely to
conflict with T10 (SCSI storage standards body).
Thanks,
--David (storm WG co-chair)
-Original Message-
From: wgchairs-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:wgchairs-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of IETF Administrative Director
Hi Ray,
1-3 April 2016 will be holiday in China. If the time is 3-8 April, then
many Chinese attendees have to give up the holiday. Would you propose
another time? Thank you.
Lizhong
- Forwarded on 2012-09-10 09:40 -
IETF Administrative Director i...@ietf.org
Sender:
On Sep 8, 2012, at 8:36 PM, Joe Touch to...@isi.edu wrote:
On 9/8/2012 11:59 AM, Melinda Shore wrote:
On 9/8/12 10:51 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
Nothing about an ID is inherently obsolete or out of date after 6 months
except its being publicly available on authorized sites (up until now).
I
I'm happier,
Made comments in another thread on why I believe it opens a security hole
wider rather than trying to close it.
I guess I could leave with it, when this downgrade is only done from a
SMTPUTF8 compatible MTA to an ASCII MTA.
I mean a SMTPUTF8 MTA MUST reject such downgrade.
Let's
On 9/10/2012 1:47 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
Michael Richardson {quigon} m...@sandelman.ca wrote:
Let me suggest that at the IETF, where the mailing list is king, you
can't join the Elite if you can't quote email properly. Maybe we should
*state* this.
...
message/rfc822 attachments don't work.
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Noel Chiappa j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu wrote:
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
i say scott should teach emacs :)
Epsilon, dude! Who the heck wants to write their editor extensions in freaking
LISP? :-)
http://xkcd.com/297/
Thanks,
Donald
Le 2012-09-10 06:46, Dearlove, Christopher (UK) a écrit :
If someone wants to provide guidance on how to do a least bad job
with Outlook, that will be gratefully received.
Found this using the Google:
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/
No idea if it's any good as I don't
lizhong@zte.com.cn wrote:
1-3 April 2016 will be holiday in China. If the time is 3-8 April, then
many Chinese attendees have to give up the holiday. Would you propose
another time? Thank you.
I think there's probably always either a major holiday somewhere or
another conference that the
On 9/9/12 8:43 PM, John Levine wrote:
Let's say I write to the IESG and say this:
Due to a late night editing error, draft-foo-bar-42 which I
submitted yesterday contains several paragraphs of company
confidential information which you can easily see are irrelevant to
the
Let's say I write to the IESG and say this:
Due to a late night editing error, draft-foo-bar-42 which I
submitted yesterday contains several paragraphs of company
confidential information which you can easily see are irrelevant to
the draft. My boss wants it taken down pronto, even
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:26:29AM -0700, ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
No, the response is that we refer you to our policy. As an open
organization we do not remove information once posted, except under
extraordinary circumstances.
Exactly. This sort of thing is wh a policy is
Let's say I write to the IESG and say this:
Due to a late night editing error, draft-foo-bar-42 which I
submitted yesterday contains several paragraphs of company
confidential information which you can easily see are irrelevant to
the draft. My boss wants it taken down pronto, even
On 9/10/2012 8:24 AM, David Borman wrote:
...
The original reason for expiring drafts, along with giving them long,
complicated names that includes the word draft, was to keep them
from being referenced as if they were standards, based on experience
gathered from the short lived IDEA document
Absolutely
Robin Wilton
Technical Outreach Director - Identity and Privacy
Internet Society
email: wil...@isoc.org
Phone: +44 705 005 2931
Twitter: @futureidentity
On 10 Sep 2012, at 11:58, Bryan McLaughlin (brmclaug) wrote:
HI Robin,
I agree it is ’blurry’
My point was that we,
The IESG has received a request from the Diameter Maintenance and
Extensions WG (dime) to consider the following document:
- 'Diameter Support for the EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP)'
draft-ietf-dime-erp-12.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks,
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Definition of Managed Objects for the Neighborhood Discovery Protocol'
(draft-ietf-manet-nhdp-mib-19.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Mobile Ad-hoc Networks Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6712
Title: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
-- HTTP Transfer for the Certificate
Management Protocol (CMP)
Author: T. Kause, M.
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6716
Title: Definition of the Opus Audio Codec
Author: JM. Valin, K. Vos,
T. Terriberry
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6719
Title: The Minimum Rank with Hysteresis
Objective Function
Author: O. Gnawali, P. Levis
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6724
Title: Default Address Selection for Internet
Protocol Version 6 (IPv6)
Author: D. Thaler, Ed.,
R. Draves,
A.
25 matches
Mail list logo
