On 9/16/2012 6:56 AM, Lawrence Conroy wrote:
...
It is VERY useful to be able to search through drafts to see how we
got here, AND to see things that were explored and abandoned.
Thieves find it very useful to have what they steal. That doesn't
legitimize their theft.
Utility can
On 9/18/12 11:46 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
On 9/16/2012 6:56 AM, Lawrence Conroy wrote:
...
It is VERY useful to be able to search through drafts to see how we
got here, AND to see things that were explored and abandoned.
Thieves find it very useful to have what they steal. That doesn't
Russ,
I had missed that section (which seems like a wonderful section btw).
However the license isn't what my initial question was about, so this is
a red herring. This also explains why I wasn't able to follow Cullen's
initial reply. My question was about the copyright header. Let's see
if I
--On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 21:24 -0500 Ben Campbell
b...@nostrum.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For
background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any
Following up on my earlier note about a comment from you that
really applies to the strategy on which all four documents are
really based...
--On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 20:44 -0500 Ben Campbell
b...@nostrum.com wrote:
...
Along the same lines, section 7 seems to go to lengths to
Joe Touch wrote:
Lawrence Conroy wrote:
It is VERY useful to be able to search through drafts to see how we
got here, AND to see things that were explored and abandoned.
Thieves find it very useful to have what they steal. That doesn't
legitimize their theft.
Utility can determine
Utility can determine whether it's worth the effort/expense to run a
public archive, but your utility never undermines my rights as an author.
We're very deep into Junior Lawyer territory here.
You might want to review RFC 3978, section 3.3a, in which contributors
make a:
perpetual,
On 9/19/2012 11:24 AM, John Levine wrote:
Utility can determine whether it's worth the effort/expense to run a
public archive, but your utility never undermines my rights as an author.
We're very deep into Junior Lawyer territory here.
I'm not. I'm simply refuting *any* argument that
On Sep 19, 2012, at 22:28, Joe Touch to...@isi.edu wrote:
I'm simply refuting *any* argument that starts with because it's useful to
the community.
Interestingly, these kinds of arguments are the only ones I'm interested in.
Until there is a court decision impacting this usefulness (or one
In article 505a2b08.70...@isi.edu you write:
On 9/19/2012 11:24 AM, John Levine wrote:
Utility can determine whether it's worth the effort/expense to run a
public archive, but your utility never undermines my rights as an author.
We're very deep into Junior Lawyer territory here.
I'm not.
The IESG has received a request from the IPv6 Maintenance WG (6man) to
consider the following document:
- 'Duplicate Address Detection Proxy'
draft-ietf-6man-dad-proxy-05.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this
The Decoupled Application Data Enroute (decade) working group in the
Transport Area has concluded. The IESG contact persons are Martin
Stiemerling and Wesley Eddy.
The DECADE working group will be closed after having completed the below
listed RFCs, but before finishing all of its chartered
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6705
Title: Localized Routing for Proxy Mobile IPv6
Author: S. Krishnan, R. Koodli,
P. Loureiro, Q. Wu,
A. Dutta
Status:
This is a reminder that any nominations for IETF leadership positions must
be sent to the NomCom on or before Monday, September 24. Additionally,
the NomCom requests that the community provide feedback to the
NomCom about the individuals that are being considered for leadership
positions.
14 matches
Mail list logo
