On 9/19/2012 3:31 PM, John Levine wrote:
In article 505a2b08.70...@isi.edu you write:
On 9/19/2012 11:24 AM, John Levine wrote:
Utility can determine whether it's worth the effort/expense to run a
public archive, but your utility never undermines my rights as an author.
We're very deep
On 09/19/2012 04:24 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
There are times when I hunger for IETF chat rooms in between IETF
meetings. Some mailing list discussions suffer from latency + piling
on. I understand that IM chat rooms would often suffer from lack of
attendance, but a sort of interim meeting could get called on IM much
more often than
Hi Nico,
On 09/19/2012 11:02 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
There are times when I hunger for IETF chat rooms in between IETF
meetings. Some mailing list discussions suffer from latency + piling
on. I understand that IM chat rooms would often suffer from lack of
attendance, but a sort of interim
--On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 23:38 +0200 Carsten Bormann
c...@tzi.org wrote:
...
Until there is a court decision impacting this usefulness (or
one can be reasonably expected), the legal angle is simply
irrelevant.
(Just keeping the thread alive so it doesn't seem that
everybody
On 9/19/2012 2:38 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 22:28, Joe Touch to...@isi.edu wrote:
I'm simply refuting *any* argument that starts with because it's
useful to the community.
Interestingly, these kinds of arguments are the only ones I'm
interested in.
Until there is a
On Sep 20, 2012, at 18:49, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
I personally don't consider it very likely that someone would
actually sue or convince some appropriate prosecutor to come
after us. But, however one assesses the likelihood of that
happening and of that party winning, I
-- Abstract should mention that this updates 3501
Really? A detail of this document updates a minor detail of that document,
that's hardly what I would expect to see in a single-paragraph summary.
I know someone who likes to repeat the Subject in the first line of the
email body text. Just
On 09/19/2012 04:24 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
We are seeking sponsors for the Bits-N-Bites event at IETF 85 in Atlanta.
This is a fairly new community networking experimental event; the first
Bits-N-Bites took place in at IETF 84 in Vancouver. The Inaugural Sponsors in
Vancouver were Juniper, Huawei, ICANN, IPSO Alliance, and the Internet
Hi John, thanks for the response. Comments inline:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 3:45 AM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
--On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 21:24 -0500 Ben Campbell
b...@nostrum.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For
background on Gen-ART, please
Hi Carsten,
At 10:28 20-09-2012, Carsten Bormann wrote:
We just had a consensus call in one WG on adopting a draft that at
this time had been expired for a year.
The chairs didn't notice, because the URI was stable (as it should be).
Send a message with a subject line of Resurrect I-D file to
On Sep 19, 2012, at 6:53 AM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
Following up on my earlier note about a comment from you that
really applies to the strategy on which all four documents are
really based...
--On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 20:44 -0500 Ben Campbell
b...@nostrum.com
Thanks for the response--comments inline:
On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:18 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no wrote:
On 09/19/2012 04:24 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
Hi,
Email discussion about the simple downgrade draft made me think of a concern
that I think I failed to mention in my review. In particular, the tunneling
mechanism allows the creation of several new Downgraded-* header fields
containing encoded content from the original message. Given that
I found no major issues with this document. I support publishing it if
the minor issues below are resolved. The document is written in a
rather information dense style, but I can't come up with any easy way to
make it more accessible. More examples and illustrations would help,
but I don't see
Total of 56 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Sep 21 00:53:02 EDT 2012
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
14.29% |8 | 15.33% |66407 | tglas...@earthlink.net
14.29% |8 | 13.55% |58688 |
The IESG has received a request from the Application Bridging for
Federated Access Beyond web WG (abfab) to consider the following
document:
- 'Name Attributes for the GSS-API EAP mechanism'
draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-naming-05.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Support for Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) Events in Sieve'
(draft-ietf-sieve-imap-sieve-09.txt) as Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Sieve Mail Filtering Language Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Pete
The Network Configuration (netconf) working group in the Operations and
Management Area of the IETF has been rechartered. For additional
information please contact the Area Directors or the WG Chairs.
Network Configuration (netconf)
Current Status:
We are seeking sponsors for the Bits-N-Bites event at IETF 85 in Atlanta.
This is a fairly new community networking experimental event; the first
Bits-N-Bites took place in at IETF 84 in Vancouver. The Inaugural Sponsors in
Vancouver were Juniper, Huawei, ICANN, IPSO Alliance, and the Internet
The IESG has received a request from the Geographic Location/Privacy WG
(geopriv) to consider the following document:
- 'Specifying Civic Address Extensions in PIDF-LO'
draft-ietf-geopriv-local-civic-06.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
22 matches
Mail list logo
