Sam -
The ISOC BoT has generally (with some slip-ups) accepted IETF process
documents as
describing the IETF process - this has been seen as a good idea for the
insurance coverage
there is no requirement in the IETF process that such RFCs be approved by the
ISOC board
nor that they
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Scott O Bradner s...@sobco.com wrote:
Sam -
The ISOC BoT has generally (with some slip-ups) accepted IETF process
documents as
describing the IETF process - this has been seen as a good idea for the
insurance coverage
there is no requirement in the
Echoing John here, he very succinctly explains why setting out clear lines of
what does or does not constitute abandonment invites abuse.
If someone is acting against the interests of the IETF, we have lots of ways of
dealing with it.
If someone falls off the face of the Earth, and repeated
five years ago, sigh. october is not a good month.
randy
