On 11/4/2012 12:22 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
Alessandro:
No. We held a BOF to answer exactly that question. The conclusion was that no
new policies were needed, but that educational material was desirable.
Russ
Which is in fact asking the 'burglars whether they should be held
accountable
Thank you Russ for the clarification and info.
I am Nomcom-eligible and you can add me to the signature list, i.e. I
support the recall.
Best regards, Tobias
On 04/11/12 09:15, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
Thanks for extra info.
You can add me to the list who sign the request for recall.
Hello Tom.
Charter text is distinct from milestones.
The charter is discussed by IESG and put out for community review.
Milestones are set by the chairs in discussion with their AD.
The process for handling the updates is also different.
The BFD chairs agreed with me that they would update the
On 11/3/2012 4:49 PM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Thu 01/Nov/2012 18:31:47 -0400 Russ Housley wrote:
A formal policy requires IETF consensus, and it would be published
as a BCP in the RFC series.
Isn't that's something the IETF will have do in any case, sooner or later?
AFAICU,
At 10:39 01-11-2012, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
As this never been attempted before, by collecting the signatures
myself, checking the NomCom eligibility and diversity in
organizations as required by RFC3777, I hoped to
There seems to be some misunderstanding about NomCom eligibility. It
As described in RFC 6722, the Tao of the IETF is published as a web page. It
can be found at http://www.ietf.org/tao.html.
In addition, five translations of the Tao are now available at
http://www.ietf.org/tao-translations.html. These languages represent the top
five non-English languages
The IETF85 Meeting agenda web page -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/85/agenda.html - has links to agenda web
pages for each working group. E.g., for avtcore, there is a link to:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/85/agenda/avtcore/
However, each working group also has a second
Lynn St. Amour ISOC president,
In accordance with the rules in RFC 3777 Section 7, I request that
you start recall proceedings against Mr. Marshall Eubanks as member of
the IAOC as well as IETF Trustee, due to his total disappearance from
the IAOC and IETF Trust for over 3 months, and
Hi, all,
The following is hopefully of interest to the IETF community.
Joe
--
CALL FOR PAPERS
2nd IEEE Workshop On Telecommunications Standards
“From Research to Standards”
June 9-13, 2013, Budapest, Hungary
Other than the CGN-mib we discussed today in sunset4, I wondered whether
is there ongoing work on this topic.
regards
Carlos
Le 2012-11-05 19:10, Carlos M. martinez a écrit :
Other than the CGN-mib we discussed today in sunset4, I wondered whether
is there ongoing work on this topic.
What do you mean exactly? Because there is nothing IPv6-specific in the
CGN MIB (or NAT MIB), it's all address-family agnostic...
Right, I have this thing that mentions to CGN somehow mean 'ipv6' to me,
or rather, 'i don't want to do ipv6'
But you are right, there is nothing specific to ipv6 in your work.
~Carlos
On 11/5/2012 7:18 PM, Simon Perreault wrote:
Le 2012-11-05 19:10, Carlos M. martinez a écrit :
Other than
Greetings,
The Nominations Committee has recently learned that Transport Area
Director Wes Eddy is unable to serve another term. Given this new
information, the NomCom is willing to accept new nominations for
Transport Area Director during the IETF week.
If you would like to make a nomination
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Additional Media Type Structured Syntax Suffixes'
(draft-ietf-appsawg-media-type-suffix-regs-08.txt) as Informational RFC
This document is the product of the Applications Area Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Barry Leiba and Pete
The IESG has received a request from the Media Server Control WG
(mediactrl) to consider the following document:
- 'Media Resource Brokering'
draft-ietf-mediactrl-mrb-16.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this
The IESG has received a request from the Network Endpoint Assessment WG
(nea) to consider the following document:
- 'PT-TLS: A TLS-based Posture Transport (PT) Protocol'
draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls-08.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
16 matches
Mail list logo
