Re: A modest proposal

2013-01-21 Thread David Morris
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013, Melinda Shore wrote: > > And too bad we can't have the IESG implement it while > > reviewing it. > > There we go. That would cut down on the "I'll support your > awful idea if you support my awful idea" horse trading. No, it just means that I have to implement my awful i

Re: A modest proposal

2013-01-21 Thread Melinda Shore
On 1/21/13 10:20 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Having to write C code probably does qualify as the appropriate > punishment :-) I guess that depends on your background ... > And too bad we can't have the IESG implement it while > reviewing it. There we go. That would cut down on the "I'll suppo

Re: A modest proposal

2013-01-21 Thread Carsten Bormann
On Jan 22, 2013, at 08:05, Melinda Shore wrote: > why you're specifically requesting implementations in C I think his argument is that the spec author should be punished for each piece of fluff in the spec. A sentiment that I can relate to. Having to write C code probably does qualify as the a

Re: A modest proposal

2013-01-21 Thread Melinda Shore
On 1/21/13 7:57 PM, William Jordan wrote: > Whoever thought it was a good idea to > allow multiple ways of doing the same exact thing would hopefully be > deterred by actually writing code to do it. I think there's general agreement that options are not a good thing and a pretty decent understan

A modest proposal

2013-01-21 Thread William Jordan
I've recent had to write a program to interface with a SIP lync server and in doing so have had to code to several rfcs. After reading and dealing with implementation of the various rfcs I have read I have come up with what I consider "A modest proposal" to fix some of the problems I've seen with

Re: LC comments on draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05

2013-01-21 Thread =JeffH
apologies for latency, many meetings and a conference in the last couple of weeks. BenL replied: > On 1 January 2013 21:50, =JeffH wrote: [ in the below discussion: "the spec", "this spec" refers to draft-laurie-pki-sunlight-05. "TLS-CT client" refers to a TLS client capable of processing

Gen-ART LC review of draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01

2013-01-21 Thread Roni Even
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-gp-obsolete-icmp-types-iana-01 Rev