On 06/08/2013 02:52 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Rule 1 for complex and divergent mail threads is to change the
Subject header when the subject changes. If you don't do that,
your mail is rather likely to get junked.
I think that IETF last call threads should stay on the main IETF
discussion
I believe that last calls must stay on this ietf list.
Any last-call-only list must be *in addition* to the ietf list, with all
announcements crossposted, and anyone sensitive to general discussion can
subscribe to that instead.
Last calls need wide exposure.
(I'm acked in at least one RFC as
On Jun 7, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Thomas Narten wrote:
What the weekly stats really ought to tally up is the readers/postings
ratio, so that folk would get more direct feedback as to whether what they are
posting is actually being read...
My strong suspicion would be that there is strong
On Jun 8, 2013, at 6:09 AM, l.w...@surrey.ac.uk l.w...@surrey.ac.uk wrote:
I believe that last calls must stay on this ietf list.
Any last-call-only list must be *in addition* to the ietf list, with all
announcements crossposted, and anyone sensitive to general discussion can
subscribe
AB,
This may surprise you, but not everyone cares what you think.
John
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2013, at 1:51 AM, Abdussalam Baryun abdussalambar...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dear Routing Area AD,
I had many comments/issues regarding your area always addressed to you
and including this
At 15:58 07-06-2013, John C Klensin wrote:
And it is getting to that conclusion from the above that often
troubles me about the posting summary list rankings. Assuming a
significant issues shows up on the list, whether in conjunction
with a Last Call or something else. Posting a comment and
On 6/8/13 10:09 AM, SM wrote:
As an off-topic comment, there are are alternative ways in making a
decision; the best judgement of the most experienced or IETF Consensus.
I don't think it's off-topic. Consensus (rough or otherwise) requires
that at some point people can live with decisions with
On 09/06/2013 07:55, Melinda Shore wrote:
On 6/8/13 10:09 AM, SM wrote:
As an off-topic comment, there are are alternative ways in making a
decision; the best judgement of the most experienced or IETF Consensus.
I don't think it's off-topic. Consensus (rough or otherwise) requires
that at
Hi,
I'm not sure how the desire for IETF Last Call discussions
to be on a dedicated and constrained mailing list in any way
implies that this generalized and unconstrained list is somehow a failure.
Filtering by subject line is unreliable.
For example, please provide a filter that will
not have
On 09/06/2013 13:20, Andy Bierman wrote:
Hi,
I'm not sure how the desire for IETF Last Call discussions
to be on a dedicated and constrained mailing list in any way
implies that this generalized and unconstrained list is somehow a failure.
Filtering by subject line is unreliable.
For
10 matches
Mail list logo
