Hi Brian,
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 12:34 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Fernando Gont; Ray Hunter; 6man Mailing List; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call:
> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Heade
On 10/13/13 5:42 AM, t.p. wrote:
I find the security considerations in this registration rather weak.
What might have sufficed in 2005 seems to me inadequate for 2013. I
would expect a clearer statement of what are or are not considered
threats or attacks and what mitigations there then are for
Fred,
On 15/10/2013 06:38, Templin, Fred L wrote:
...
>> We could have that discussion in 6man, sure, but I don't believe that
>> it's
>> relevant to the question of whether draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-
>> chain
>> is ready.
>
> If it messes up tunnels, then it's not ready.
That doesn't fol
All,
If you are new to the IETF, we would like to invite you to participate in the
new IETF Mentoring Program at the upcoming IETF 88 in Vancouver. The goal of
the IETF Mentoring Program is to match people new to the IETF (people who have
participated in three or fewer face-to-face meetings or
Not that I am aware of.
> -Original Message-
> From: SM [mailto:s...@resistor.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 11:20 AM
> To: Ronald Bonica
> Cc: ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Last Call:
> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
>
> Hi Ron,
> At 16:55
Hi Ron,
At 16:55 13-10-2013, Ronald Bonica wrote:
Are you suggesting that we don't address the problem because the
code is too complex to touch?
It's a known problem since at least seven years. Given that the
problem is labelled as a security issue there would have to be some
changes to the
Hi Ron,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ronald Bonica [mailto:rbon...@juniper.net]
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 7:07 PM
> To: Brian E Carpenter; Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Fernando Gont; 6man Mailing List; ietf@ietf.org; Ray Hunter
> Subject: RE: Last Call:
> (Implications of Oversized IPv6
Hi Brian,
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2013 3:42 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: Fernando Gont; Ray Hunter; 6man Mailing List; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Last Call:
> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header
I think this is sensible, could be useful, won’t break anything, and
probably hits a huge 80/20 points for the ways people might want to address
inside spreadsheets. Go ahead and publish it.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:50 AM, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request to update the IANA
- Original Message -
From: "Barry Leiba"
To: "t.p."
Cc: "IETF discussion list"
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 4:31 PM
> > I find the security considerations in this registration rather weak.
> > What might have sufficed in 2005 seems to me inadequate for 2013. I
> > would expect a clea
Youtube URL.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2UWRuIXXzYs
On 10/13/2013 3:16 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I know we don't normally do movie plugs on this list, but anyone
who's planning to attend the technical plenary in Vancouver
could do worse than watch "Terms and Conditions May Apply".
It c
> I find the security considerations in this registration rather weak.
> What might have sufficed in 2005 seems to me inadequate for 2013. I
> would expect a clearer statement of what are or are not considered
> threats or attacks and what mitigations there then are for them.
Tom, do you have spe
For what it's worth, I think Russ and Jari did the right thing in
signing the statement the way they did, at the time they did it, with
the prior consultation they did.
I was not consulted. And I'm glad they are capable of acting at this
level without consulting me.
On 10/11/2013 06:02 PM,
On 13/10/2013 20:16, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I know we don't normally do movie plugs on this list, but anyone
who's planning to attend the technical plenary in Vancouver
could do worse than watch "Terms and Conditions May Apply".
It covers both commercial and governmental invasions of privacy,
a
There is an important difference between policy and politics. Promoting a
politics discussion within the IETF arena will become the demise of the
IETF.
-J
On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
>
> It is clear to me that the IETF cannot be away from Internet
> Governance
The problem is not what actually each person said but what "they" say it was
said and gets recorded into a statement that has no weight and it is not
representative of the entire community.
-Jorge
> On Oct 12, 2013, at 7:23 AM, Stephen Farrell
> wrote:
>
>
> Hiya,
>
>> On 10/12/2013 01:0
On 10/10/2013 19:50, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request to update the IANA registration of
the text/csv media type, adding an optional fragment identifier.
The request comes from a document in the Independent stream, and the
IESG is the change controller for the text/csv media type.
17 matches
Mail list logo