Mark, many thanks for your comments; I've had very similar thoughts and
concerns myself.
At 12:54 10/8/00 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote:
Recently, there's been a lot of discussion in various places about the
status of WREC, particularly since there are a few other proposals for new
working
At 12:18 10/11/00 -0400, Michael Richardson wrote:
"Randall" == Randall Gellens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Registration, Hotel and Airline Discount information for the 49th IETF
meeting is now available at:
http://www.ietf.org/meetings/IETF-49.html
Randall The
At 22:48 -0400 2001-10-23, Dan Kolis wrote:
Why isn't the Internet and 3D technology used for the IETF meetings ?
The Next Generation IPv8 Internet has that. Why is the IPv4 Internet
Ok. MBone or not, Mime type or not, whatever. Is there some 3D imaging thing
that actually exists for
--On Saturday, January 19, 2002 17:32 -0800 Lixia Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If talking personal preference...
I would rather prefer not to have anything officially scheduled on Sunday
since that fundamentally requires we leave for the trip one day earlier.
Friday is not too good
Without wishing to drag this thread on yet longer...
--On Wednesday, January 23, 2002 08:49 -0800 Kyle Lussier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The entire process will certainly have an impact on the organization,
even if certification is never revoked. The process of developing
test
--On Monday, March 18, 2002 15:59 + Paul Robinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In addition, I still find it amazing that people are justifying costs due
to the number of breakfasts and cookies being served. The word
'ludicrous' is overused on this list, but I think I've found a situation
--On Monday, March 18, 2002 08:17 -0800 Kevin C. Almeroth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, slightly better than just not showing up is watching the
multicast feed.
In fact, the more people who choose to participate this way
will indeed serve to make a justification to make this better,
i.e.
--On Monday, March 18, 2002 12:25 -0800 Bonney Kooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bonney -
1) the meeting fee is USD 425. You pay an USD 150
penalty for forcing us to
staff the registration desk with people authorized
to handle credit
Since the RFC Editor has a draft out that will update the instructions to
RFC authors (draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-00.txt) this seems a reasonable
time to bring up a query.
Section 10 of RFC2223 reads:
10. Author's Address Section
Each RFC must have at the very end a section giving the
--On Thursday, March 28, 2002 12:25 -0800 Mark Atwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And the authors do caution that their numbers are blind to the quality
of the RFCs. Their point, though, is that looking at the easy metrics
is better than not measuring
--On 17 August 2004 09:20 -0700 Bob Braden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find?
*
* It seems to me this list deserves top ranking on the first page at
* www.ietf.org, but that's certainly not
At 12:29 6/15/2001 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do the charter authors intend that this group's purview include bridges,
routers, NATs, proxies, firewalls, gateways, etc?
The charter covers none of these things.
*cough*
I'd seriously hope it would cover proxies and gateways, for some
At 07:55 6/19/2001 -0700, Michael W. Condry wrote:
Keith-
Our interest in OPES and the interest of the folks we are working with
are not with services such as unrequested ad insertion or other items that
might
be viewed as offensive. Lots of things can be mis-used, SPAM email
is a better
At 21:43 7/4/2001 -0700, Tomlinson, Gary wrote:
On Wednesday, July 04, 2001 @5:06 PM Michael W. Condry wrote:
out of interest, did any other groups need to have
these restrictions?
At 11:03 PM 7/3/2001 -0700, James P. Salsman wrote:
I hope that the latest attempt at the OPES charter is
[Sorry for the noise folks]
At 16:43 8/1/2001 -0700, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
There's the opportunity picket outside the US Embassy...
protests against the imprisonment of Dmitry Sklyarov, starts at the Hyde
Park tube stop (blue line so you can go direct from heathrow ;)) at 12:30
and marches to the
15 matches
Mail list logo
