From: pwe3-boun...@ietf.orgmailto:pwe3-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:pwe3-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:10 AM
To: p...@ietf.orgmailto:p...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.orgmailto:ietf@ietf.org
Cc: pwe3-cha...@tools.ietf.orgmailto:pwe3-cha
During Auth 48, the authors of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status found some
issues with the acknowledgement procedures in Section 5.3 of the draft that we
feel should be addressed before publication. Since the draft has already been
through WG and IETF last call, we would like to highlight the
Sasha,
On your final comment on the concept of an MPLS-TP PW, RFC5586 has already made
the distinction between the use of the GAL on PWs in MPLS-TP and in other MPLS
environments. This draft aligns the two cases in terms of the applicability of
the GAL, by updating RFC5586 to remove the
Ben,
Apologies for missing your additional questions. Please see below for a
response.
Best regards,
Matthew
From: Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com
To: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew) matthew.bo...@alcatel-lucent.com
Reply-to: b...@nostrum.com
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mpls
Ben,
Thank you for your comments. Please see below.
Best regards
Matthew
On 21/12/2010 22:13, Ben Campbell b...@nostrum.com wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Tom,
Many thanks for your comments. I have copied Loa who may want to respond to the
procedural comments.
Please see responses below for responses to technical/document content issues.
Best regards
Matthew, Stewart and Dan
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org
Tom,
Thanks for your comment.
3.4.1 says
The data plane behaviour of MPLS-TP is the same as the best current
practise for MPLS. This includes the setting of the S-Bit.
Without a reference, or any detail, I think this can only
muddy the waters. How do I know that your best
