Re: IETF 88 - Hotel Reservations: REMINDER

2013-09-18 Thread Brian Haberman
Hi Marcia, On 9/18/13 11:54 AM, IETF Agenda wrote: You can still use the main reservation links provided on the meeting web page at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/88/hotel.html for both the Hyatt and Fairmont, but please let me know once you have made your reservation. I have already made

Re: Remote participants, newcomers, and tutorials

2013-07-28 Thread Brian Haberman
Hi Dave, I am not Jari, but I do have an opinion on your thoughts below... On 7/29/13 1:25 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: I've been finding discussion and actions about newcomers far more interesting this year, than most previous ones. So I think it's worth pressing on several fronts, to see

Re: IETF Diversity

2013-06-19 Thread Brian Haberman
On 6/19/13 11:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: My point, poorly expressed though it was, is that it's not productive for us all to wait from word on high before taking positive action. Members of the IESG, IAB, IOAC, or any other official body are just folks who are temporarily serving the

Re: IETF Diversity

2013-06-19 Thread Brian Haberman
On 6/19/13 11:31 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 6/19/13 9:26 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: On 6/19/13 11:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: My point, poorly expressed though it was, is that it's not productive for us all to wait from word on high before taking positive action. Members of the IESG

Re: Is this an elephant? [Was: call for ideas: tail-heavy IETF process]

2013-05-17 Thread Brian Haberman
Dave, On 5/17/13 11:37 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: On 5/17/2013 7:01 AM, Keith Moore wrote: But WGs should be able to periodically summarize what they're doing - what problem they're trying to solve, what approach they're taking, what technologies they're using, what major decisions they've made,

Re: Mentoring

2013-03-14 Thread Brian Haberman
On 3/14/13 4:31 PM, Eggert, Lars wrote: Hi, On Mar 14, 2013, at 16:26, Murray S. Kucherawy superu...@gmail.com wrote: I haven't observed that many newcomers at the newcomer meet-and-greet. They seem to be overwhelmed (numerically) by the ADs+chairs that go, which is reinforced by ADs+chairs

Re: IPv6 update for BCP5?

2013-01-27 Thread Brian Haberman
On 1/27/13 10:07 AM, tglassey wrote: So... we probably need a IPv6 update for BCP5 (RFC1918), doesnt that make sense? My understanding is people have been using ULAs (RFC 4193) for this type of functionality. Todd

Re: [lisp] Last Call: draft-ietf-lisp-eid-block-03.txt (LISP EID Block) to Informational RFC

2012-11-27 Thread Brian Haberman
I want to thank everyone who has provided feedback on this draft. Given the issues raised, I am sending the draft back to the LISP WG for additional work. I encourage folks interested in this draft to participate on the LISP mailing list. Regards, Brian On 11/13/12 9:45 AM, The IESG wrote:

IETF63 Network and IPv6

2005-08-03 Thread Brian Haberman
IETF'ers, I would like to raise an issue with everyone in Paris using the IPv6 support provided by France Telecom and the volunteer NOC squad. There are a few rogue client nodes advertising themselves as IPv6 routers. Here is a list of the guilty parties: 1. MAC = 00:05:4E:43:51:AA

Re: 1918bis

2005-02-05 Thread Brian Haberman
My understanding is that the IESG (or some part of it) is having the DNS text looked at by the DNS directorate. Regards, Brian On Feb 4, 2005, at 15:29, Sam Hartman wrote: Tony == Tony Hain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tony and now the replacement ULA space is unable to be published Tony as