On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 14:44, IETF Chair ch...@ietf.org wrote:
There is no crisis, but there is a need for action so that the Internet can
continue to grow. The transition to IPv6 requires the attention of many
actors. However, our parents, spouses, and children will be largely unaware
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 17:46, Steven M. Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
It's happened to me twice, with two different lists of his. I've
complained to him, but to no avail. I wonder if the CAN SPAM act
applies.
Unfortunately, no, thanks to (deliberate?) loopholes and
shortfalls of
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Stephane H Maes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be an artifact of email or I may have missed some earlier relevant
exchanges, but I am a bit surprised that it is announced for the first time ~
10 minutes before the event... Of course some of us can't attend
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Stephane H Maes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be an artifact of email or I may have missed some earlier relevant
exchanges, but I am a bit surprised that it is announced for the first time ~
10 minutes before the event... Of course some of us can't attend
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Lixia Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I questioned the reporter why she ignored my request, the reply was that it
was the magazine's policy not allowing preview --- something they never told
me beforehand.
One lesson learned.
Indeed. It may be worth
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you know not consenting to interviews with someone who's professionalism
you don't respect. Why you would expect someone engaged in serious
journalism or otherwise to offer you the opportunity to modulate your own
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Fred Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 24, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Marc Manthey wrote:
marratech was aquired by google in 2005 , so i guess its not available
anymore ( was java by the way and a bit slow )
I keep hearing this, and I use it every week. Someday
2008/7/23 Huntak Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi.
I'd like not to receive ietf mail any more in this e-mail address.
please don't send mail to this e-mail([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The link appended to the bottom of every message distributed by
this list is what you want. Go to
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Andrew G. Malis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thomas,
I would personally find this more useful if it were measured by
subject line rather than by sender.
Thread metrics can be found all around the web if you're
interested. GMANE and MARC are just two such
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest that the IESG also think about hosting all IETF lists in
house in the future.
The main reason for this is legal, a list that is maintained by the IETF
is much more satisfactory in a patent
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Ofer Inbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: IPv6 only Plenary Makes the News
Isn't that just a press release from ISOC, being distributed by wire
services online?
-- Cos
Yes, that's correct. Still interesting to see it picked up by
other
On Feb 20, 2008 12:23 PM, lconroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
WTF - why am I REQUIRED to enter the ISO-3166 code for my country
of residence.
[snip!]
This is (if nothing else) a Fenian ploy.
[snip!]
add United Kingdom (UK), you *[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not sure where in your rant you
On Feb 20, 2008 12:04 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip!]
My browser (the latest version of Safari on the Mac) complains that
the issuer of the certificate is untrusted. That would be Starfield
Secure Certification Authority.
Is this a CA in good standing that we should
Ray,
Which services will be affected by this (all, Tools EDU, email)?
On Feb 20, 2008 12:52 PM, Ray Pelletier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ATT, the IPv6 service provider for the IETF, is planning a major
change in their IPv6 network on Thursday, 21 February, at 8am
Eastern for one
On Feb 13, 2008 2:05 PM, Henning Schulzrinne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for a reasonably recent presentation on the state of IP
address allocation that would be suitable for a class I'm teaching.
Thanks.
Henning
___
Ietf mailing list
On Feb 6, 2008 1:29 PM, Edward Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:37 -0800 2/6/08, $someone wrote:
The descriptions of the venue make clear that, once again, the IETF is
meeting
in a ghetto. Periodic bus service doesn't counteract that.
I really have a hard time being sympathetic to this
2008/2/4 Dan York [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FYI, Richard Stiennon at ZDNet noticed that the root servers will be
IPv6-accessible and refers to it as the Birth of IPv6:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=527
He was pointing over to the BBC article about this:
On Dec 14, 2007 9:19 AM, Marshall Eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that there is work going on today with the transfer of
services from NSS
to AMS, and I suspect that these errors may be connected to this.
It may be, but according to Ray Pelletier (Administrative
Director), the DNS
On Dec 13, 2007 10:48 AM, Russ Housley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need both physical (power, hardware, location) and
operational (different global prefixes, preferably different
AS's) diversity for reliable DNS.
We knew about this problem, but choose to make the
On Dec 6, 2007 8:59 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only part of the meeting fee is profit for the IETF and an even smaller part
of the attendee costs. It cost my employer roughly $2,000 for me to attend
the Vancouver IETF for two days. That is $6,000 for the IETF to make
On Dec 2, 2007 4:55 PM, Frank Ellermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lixia Zhang wrote:
The remedy here may also include the cost to those people who
acted on a published RFC in its first 2 months.
Yes, or months earlier, for the case I have in mind more than
two years, millions of users, and
21 matches
Mail list logo
