ers and to those who defend them.
And I loved the cat and mice game.
Mr. Halvestrand is correct.
My name is not Eduardo Mendez.
When the IANA list is activated I may join it openly.
As long as it uses an alias, I think I can do the same.
Actually, I think I had to.
We could not come in official capacity.
did.
Eduardo Mendez
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
-- Forwarded message --From: Eduardo Mendez [EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 10-dic-2005 11:43
Subject: Need for a rebuild [was I-D file formats and internationalization]To: Gray, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED]2005/12/5, Gray, Eric
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ted,-- The IETF does not make any effort
It was sad that people can accept this.
To degrade the name of their friends.
In every country this is insulting.
It is good news you can type better.
But this has not changed in RFC.
If in the thanks section you hurt a name.
The thanked person, will not be happy.
Eduardo Mendez
2005/11/30
Mr. Chair,
2005/10/29, Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Eduardo Mendez wrote:
I understand why IETF fears local governments for their meetings.
I simply do not understand this statement. The IETF has no
concerns about governments, and we often have people in government
service who
IETF Member do not realize this?
If they were told they would understand.
Why not to invite local people free?
Why not to coordinate with local ISOC Chapters?
IETF is to be part of the real world.
Eduardo Mendez
2005/10/24, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.publictechnology.net
Please count me on the mailing list.
The concept is interesting.
Eduardo Mendez
2005/10/16, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I consider working on a Draft on meta-spam and would be interested
in comments and in interests to participate to a preparatory mailing
list. I define meta-spam
I corrected error (underlined). Apologies.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eduardo Mendez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 17-oct-2005 16:27
Subject: Re: Can the USA welcome IETF (was: Last Call under RFC 3683
concerning Dean Anderson (reissued))
To: David Kessens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005/10
2005/10/17, Noel Chiappa [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From: Eduardo Mendez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are other countries
Please keep the nationalism out of this. The IETF is not a country.
Mr. Noel,
I am sorry. There is nothing nationalism.
(Which nationalism?)
The IETF is a subsidiary of ISOC
things in a wrong way.
I think RFC 3683 is a big bug.
It take too much time to me.
Eduardo Mendez.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
not interested in dicussing RFC that way.
Eduardo Mendez
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
country we want Members. Including the USA.
Let be sure the way some use it will not cost us a lot.
If there is a risk, how to correct it.
This seems quite reasonable?
Eduardo Mendez
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman
2005/10/17, Bill Manning [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
M. Eduardo,
i am persaded that you are inconsistent at best. first you state:
This is may be we do not share the same culture.
Every culture is to be respected.
and then you state:
On Oct 17, 2005, at 10:04, Eduardo Mendez wrote
running the Internet.
And the Google Evangelist head the IETF meetings
Eduardo Mendez
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
and defense.
. he belongs to Judges.
. he belongs to appeal Judges.
I do not know that person, but when is the process to castigate him if
he is wrong? Who would then pay damages to Dean? Dean is technically
in desadvantage.
Then I must oppose.
Eduardo Mendez
2005/10/10, Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED
Can someone explain what is this?
Is it issued by the IESG? Is this a procecussion?
Where is the defense of Dean?
Has the Last Call started? When does it finish?
I am very confused.
Eduardo Mendez
The IESG received a request from Dave Crocker to take action under RFC
3683 against Dean
16 matches
Mail list logo
