-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric
Rescorla
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?
I find that I work more effectively when I have computer and Internet
available
WEG] Me too,
I've been watching this discussion across several attendee lists, plenaries,
etc and it appears that we have a routing loop.
Perhaps it's time for those who seem most concerned about this to author a BCP
draft regarding IETF meeting venue and hotel selection policies that addresses
this, so
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Keith
Moore
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 8:37 AM
To: Ray Pelletier
Cc: John C Klensin; Secretariat IETF; IETF-Discussion list; Lixia Zhang
Subject: Re: Hyatt Taipei cancellation policy?
$300/night is far too high a
From: Keith Moore mo...@network-heretics.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt (IPv6 Support
Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard
I support publication of some document like this one. Suggestions for
clarification to this
From: SM s...@resistor.net
To: ietf@ietf.org
Reply-to: s...@resistor.net
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt (IPv6 Support
Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard
X-RSN: 1/0/933/10475/58528
From Section 1:
However, due to the success of the Internet
From: t.petch daedu...@btconnect.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Reply-to: daedu...@btconnect.com
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt (IPv6Support
Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard
I find this document utterly bizarre and think it would seriously damage
From: SM s...@resistor.net
To: Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
Reply-to: s...@resistor.net
Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv6-required-01.txt (IPv6 Support
Required for all IP-capable nodes) to Proposed Standard
Section 2 of RFC 4084 lists the primary IP service terms:
From: Keith Moore [mailto:mo...@network-heretics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 6:48 PM
To: George, Wesley
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; v6...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt
(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic
From: Keith Moore [mailto:mo...@network-heretics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 11:21 AM
To: George, Wesley
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; v6...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt
(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds (6to4) to Historic
From: v6ops-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of TJ
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 7:33 AM
To: Tim Chown
Cc: v6...@ietf.org WG; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Last Call: draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-04.txt
(Request to move Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4
At the risk of rehashing discussion from WGLC...
Ole has addressed some of your points, I'll address a few others below inline.
From: v6ops-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Keith
Moore
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2011 1:22 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: v6...@ietf.org;
11 matches
Mail list logo