that, though it
seems maybe there could be some way of marking this part will be executed.)
cheers, Greg Minshall (happy FreeBSD user)
UUCP world.
i guess if i think anything about all that, it is that if NATs are ubiquitous,
we should figure out how to deal with them. and, that (hopefully), we will
achieve the "greater interconnectivity" on top of, and to some extent in spite
of NATs.
cheers, Greg Minshall
Brian,
i'm a big proponent of autoconfiguring using ethernet addresses, as well as in
stable IPv{4,6} addresses.
however ...
Mine is 004096333cf6; feel free to sell this number to the highest bidder :-)
i wonder if you would be so quick to offer up your ethernet address if there
existed
RFCs should not be referencing I-Ds, imho. if they *do*, then something
slipped through the cracks, imho. (if they do, i assume it is because during
the RFC's pre-life as an I-D it referenced companion I-Ds and the companion
either died some deserved death on its way to RFCdom, or the
