with unnamed type
processing support reasons - no mas.
--
HLS
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Andrew Sullivan a...@anvilwalrusden.comwrote:
Note that I am not the shepherd for this draft, but I am the WG
co-chair.
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 05:05:21PM +0200, Måns Nilsson wrote:
* The charter
text.
--
hls
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On 8/30/11, Keith Moore mo...@network-heretics.com wrote:
On Aug 30, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Personally I think 2119 is just fine and doesn't need to be updated.
Keith
+1
--
hls
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
hls
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
works better if existing optional (and much older)
protocol Y is applied as a SHOULD. It would like to say MUST but it
can't because Y is already optional and not required. This new
interpretation will make software implementing X non-compliant if it
also doesn't support Y.
---
HLS
On Mon, Aug 29
a SHOULD as already non-compliant.
--
hls
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
