Re: Thanks for visiting MP3.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 07 Jul 2000 01:52:03 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Thanks again for visiting MP3.com and providing us with your email address. If you would like to unsubscribe from future MP3.com announcements, or if you received this message in error, please see the bottom of this message for instructions. OK.. I'll bite. Is mp3.com spamming non-visitors, or did somebody visit and give the IETF as their e-mail address? Sorry, it's been a long day, and I'd love to use a clue-by-four on somebody, but it's not obvious who to use it on... ;) -- Valdis Kletnieks Operating Systems Analyst Virginia Tech Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature OK, I'll bite now. I know what a two-by-four is, but what's a clue-by-four? -- Jonathan Buschmann Siemens Information and Communication Networks S.p.A. CLTB, Cascina Castelletto, 20019 Settimo Milanese (Mi) Italy Phone: (+39-2)43888754 Fax: (+39-2)43887989 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Sometimes when you fill a vacuum, it still sucks." - Dennis Ritchie
Re: Fwd: FC: Pittsburgh politicos don't like criticism at anonymous web site
It worked for me. "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" wrote: URL is typoed below. It's really www.tribune-review.com ^ Donald From: Richard Shockey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 17:51:39 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] News from our host city... Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 00:14:02 -0700 Subject: Online criticism of politicians draws lawsuit From: Jack Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declan McCullagh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Online criticism of politicians draws lawsuit City: Pittsburgh, State: PA, Country: United States Government officials in Pittsburgh have launched a courtroom assault on a Web site that allows citizens to anonymously criticize the authorities. (6/30/00) URL: http://www.tribunereview.com/news/pgs0630.html -- POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ -- Please Note New Contact Information: Richard Shockey Shockey Consulting LLC 5237 Sutherland St. Louis, MO 63109 Voice 314.503.0640 eFAX Fax to EMail 815.333.1237 (Preferred for Fax) INTERNET Mail IFAX : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message was passed through [EMAIL PROTECTED], which is a sublist of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not all messages are passed. Decisions on what to pass are made solely by Harald Alvestrand. -- Jonathan Buschmann Siemens Information and Communication Networks S.p.A. CLTB, Cascina Castelletto, 20019 Settimo Milanese (Mi) Italy Phone: (+39-2)43888754 Fax: (+39-2)43887989 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Sometimes when you fill a vacuum, it still sucks." - Dennis Ritchie
Re: FW: DELIVERY FAILURE: User socialevent (socialevent@marconi.com) not listed in public Name Address Book
Glenn Parsons wrote: Folks, I just tried to send a message to Marconi (to the address indicated on the IETF 48 social site) querying about tax being charged on the social event when you reserve on the website. I received the following NDN. Has anyone else tried this address? Thanks, Glenn. -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2000 2:35 pm To: Parsons, Glenn Subject:DELIVERY FAILURE: User socialevent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) not listed in public Name Address Book Your message Subject: IETF social fee was not delivered to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] because: User socialevent ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) not listed in public Name Address Book Yep. Tried Monday and this AM - got the same message. Had problems with my reservations too. -- Jonathan Buschmann Siemens Information and Communication Networks S.p.A. CLTB, Cascina Castelletto, 20019 Settimo Milanese (Mi) Italy Phone: (+39-2)43888754 Fax: (+39-2)43887989 [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Sometimes when you fill a vacuum, it still sucks." - Dennis Ritchie
Re: Last Call: An Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement(SACK) Option for TCP to Proposed Standard
The IESG wrote: The IESG has received a request from the Working Group to consider An ^tsvwg Extension to the Selective Acknowledgement (SACK) Option for TCP draft-floyd-sack-00.txt as a Proposed Standard. I thought this was originally proposed as an Experimental RFC - the minutes from the tsvwg DC meeting confirm that. When, how and why was this changed? I didn't see any discussion on the mailing list. jonathan
