For what its worth, and maybe its just that I haven't mucked around
with the standard templates for MS Word, but I print ID's and RFC's
through MS Word by adjusting page setup.
If you open the plain text ID text document and set the page setup to
0.9 top margin and 0.8 bottom margin, it should
There are all sorts of ways IP addresses can be
shared by multiple machines which you may or may
not choose to use.
Not if you are running pure IP. Either you can uniquely identify
each machine,
or you can't, but you cannot have it both ways.
What about NAT?
I apologize for asking, but...
I have been reading the ietf-opes.org pages again and I still can't get
a good hold on what OPES is trying to accomplish. There are a lot of
drafts listed on the site that discuss several scenarios like content
peering, edge caching, etc., and while that's all nice
I believe OPES-like services are already creeping in. Consider wireless
systems where a great deal of compression is employed to reduce data
streams. This includes proprietary mechanisms to re-publish graphics
and web pages to reduce bandwidth requirements.
However, in such systems where the
--- John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Farley wrote:
--- John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today, if you want to
spam all of
them, you have to subscribe to all of them, which is impractical.
(I spoke sloppily, by the way. For today, read with separate
filters
I think I might set a filter to look for this thread in the subject
line of my email and dump it. It only takes a minute to set it up.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
--- John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Richardson wrote:
This list of lists, alas, would become a spammer/head-hunter
target if
made too easily accessible, but we already have that problem.
In addition, it would mean that anybody subscribed to one IETF list
could spam
IMHO, a successful WG is one whereby it has been successful been
adopted
and used by the industry.
-James Seng
Like NAT?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year!
The host *is* the edge of the network.
I'm sorry to have not mentioned that I consider the host nodes, or
the end nodes, are not edges but instead something attaching on
network edges. I consider the very last hub, or the access router
which the end nodes connected to as the 'network
?
Kevin Farley
__
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
n it comes to buying NAT devices, "buyer beware" should be the
mantra of the day.
And now the question(s) of the day:
What is the solution that can be deployed today or in the next 6 months
that will replace the function of NATs in the IPv4 Internet? What about
in the next year? 2 years?
Keith,
Thank you for your insightful response to my posting. Is it fair to say
then, that in the year 2001, there appears to be no widely deployable
alternative to NAT?
Kevin
--- Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin,
I don't disagree with most of your assertions, except perhaps one
--- Sean Doran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith Moore writes:
| but I'm fairly convinced that we are *far* better off with a global
| name space for network attachment points, which are exposed and
| visible to hosts and applications, than we are with only locally
| scoped addresses visible
How does the idea of NAT destroy the global Internet address space?
because in a NATted network the same addresses are used in different
parts of the network. addresses are meaningless.
So what? Why is this the big problem?
__
Do You
14 matches
Mail list logo
