for this purpose.
--
Mike Fisk, RADIANT Team, Network Engineering Group, Los Alamos National Lab
See http://home.lanl.gov/mfisk/ for contact information
On Thu, 21 Dec 2000, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
At 09:47 19/12/2000 -0800, Mike Fisk wrote:
It's an argument of semantics, but I prefer to say that we're separating
transport-layer end-to-end from application-layer end-to-end. Make
applications explicitly terminate transport connections
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 14:45:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Fisk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gateways that surreptitiously modify packets can break ANY end-to-end
protocol no matter what layer it's at. Assume that we sacrifice IP
addresses
y services (or SIP servers) can provide the
same secure mapping to a key and/or DNS name.
--
Mike Fisk, RADIANT Team, Network Engineering Group, Los Alamos National Lab
See http://home.lanl.gov/mfisk/ for contact information
error rate. Basically, you assume that
your ethernet is as reliable as your SCSI cable or fiber-channel network.
For a well engineered, fully-switched LAN, that may be a reasonable
assumption.
-- Mike Fisk, RADIANT Team, Network Engineering Group, Los Alamos National
Lab See http://home.lanl.gov/mfisk
