I've put together a draft web page that is intended to be usable to any
working group mailing list. I'd appreciate review comments on it.
It is at:
http://mipassoc.org/mass/ietf-list-rules.html
Looks good Dave - thanks for doing this. One thing that could be added is
info on what is an
Volunteer in the house?
Sure.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
(This is made fairly clear in the Tao of the IETF, which
is more or less required reading for newcomers:
http://www.ietf.org/tao.html#2 .)
Actually the latest version is here:
http://edu.ietf.org/tao
Paul Hoffman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and I welcome comments on the draft..
If people want that possibility described, please speak up - Carl has the
pen ready
Yes that would be helpful.
Well, I don't agree. I think it would defocus the discussion (which
is about putting the IETF's administration onto a business-like
basis). IMHO the only case in which
The same applies to Sunday and Friday but this hasn't caused any problem
so-far. Why would Saturday be different?
Because (U.S., maybe Pac Rim?) Jewish attendees can get back home in time
for Friday night services when we end on Friday. If we end on Saturday,
there's no way to get back home
Just so we're clear, that was my going-in assumption and I've kept
that throughout the analysis. Any of the structures I've outlined
Understood.
can be focused strictly on administrative support (just like
any of the structures could be corrupted to reach beyond that
focus). That's why I
You know how many times I go to conferences and end up just
leaving the bag or whatever the gift is in the hotel room?
Every single one.
Though, I must say, the bag from Salt Lake City is the best
one I've ever been given and still use that. So unless
there is a really high quality bag
Copy of the announcement below.
One quick question Harald - am I right that the new procedure applies only
to RFCs, not I-Ds? Any plans in the works for changing the way I-Ds are
reviewed?
There is also an excellent steak house just the other side of the
street, that's even skyway accessible.
And only ~$50 minimum per dinner ...
But what about having a 90-120 minute plenary
immediately BEFORE the Sunday reception?
Besides technical presentations, IANA report and the like, it could include
the IAB time, since the IAB is about 'strategic' issues. (Having the IESG
later in the week is useful
* If so, should we continue with IESG on Wednesday and IAB on
Thursday, or should we alternate them (or adopt some more
radical schedule change -- probably too late for Minneapolis at
this point).
I like the idea of keeping to the two-plenary schedule at every IETF.
* And should the IAB
Easy - don't go to events where you don't want people to know.
The names are available. If you don't want your name on the
list of attendees - don't attend. I doubt they copied the
entire list. What horrible thing do you think they were
doing with your name or email address? Is the fact
I'd second Dave's suggestion that we leave the POISSON list as is. Aside
from the overhead of multiple lists, confusion might reign about which
list is discussing which topic, with people ending up posting to multiple
lists, etc.
The increased focus may also help with the problem that POISSON
13 matches
Mail list logo
