Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice

2013-09-22 Thread Ted Lemon
On Sep 19, 2013, at 7:01 PM, Kevin Darcy k...@chrysler.com wrote: What would be the preferred way to provide a mixed list of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, in a DHCPv6 option? IPv4-mapped addresses? The preferred way would be not to do that. I think there is a document floating around out there

Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-14.txt (Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options) to Best Current Practice

2013-09-20 Thread Kevin Darcy
What would be the preferred way to provide a mixed list of IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, in a DHCPv6 option? IPv4-mapped addresses? Or, is it assumed that any service which can be reached over IPv4 or IPv6 by any given (dual-stack) client would use DNS FQDNs exclusively, rather than addresses?