On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Russ Housley wrote:
2. Independent submission informational RFC
...
Today, the IESG asks the RFC Editor to hold the rejected alternative
until the standards-track document is in the RFC Editor queue, and
the informational document will be published with a note indicating
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
I thought the solution in the DLV case was useful, albeit not terribly so -
publish a specification that didn't really specify anything, but got the
codepoint, and then follow up with the real specification as an ind-sub when
that was
Samuel Weiler skrev:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Russ Housley wrote:
2. Independent submission informational RFC
...
Today, the IESG asks the RFC Editor to hold the rejected alternative
until the standards-track document is in the RFC Editor queue, and
the informational document will be published
