On Jan 10, 2006, at 5:47 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
Lucy, I suspect that they merely were making a spelling error,
since I'm sure they were referring to folk who are truly essential,
and therefore qualify as linch pins...
I have never heard of a linching party. RFCs filled with base64
Hi. I'd hoped to avoid this, but a number of people both on and
off-list have asked me to discuss the issue of accessibility of documents.
for those who may not know, I'm blind.
I try and avoid such discussions. It is fairly clear to me that my
standards of accessibility are different than
Hi, Sam,
Thank you for taking the time to explain this stuff to us. It is very
helpful.
Just on your last point:
pictures: I guess someone might want to include a photo or other
picture in an IETF spec. I'd kind of like to know why. Be sure to
explain what the point of the photo is in the
--On Tuesday, 10 January, 2006 16:58 -0600 Spencer Dawkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I'm also thinking that if an RFC is bad enough, having
pictures of authors/editors might make it easier to recognize
the guilty parties and organize a lynch mob, and that might do
more to improve our
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Tuesday, 10 January, 2006 16:58 -0600 Spencer Dawkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I'm also thinking that if an RFC is bad enough, having
pictures of authors/editors might make it easier to recognize
the guilty parties and organize a
Dear Dave and Lucy,
watch how you use the word lynch please. As the oldest of six
I'm a bit *sensitive* to mob comments. ;-)
Lucy, I suspect that they merely were making a spelling error, since I'm
sure they were referring to folk who are truly essential, and therefore
qualify as linch