Robert Sayre schrieb:
...
It would also be a good idea to give a disposition on each last call
comment received.
...
This is so true and applies to certain other working groups as well...
Best regards, Julian
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
Julian Reschke schrieb:
Robert Sayre schrieb:
The IESG has received a request from the Atom Publishing Format and
Protocol WG (atompub) to consider the following document:
- 'The Atom Publishing Protocol '
draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt as a Proposed Standard
By my count,
Julian Reschke wrote:
I guess I need to rephrase that...
The important thing is that there's quite a number of changes that
should be applied to draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt, some
editorial, some clarifications, and potentially at least one normative
change.
It may be that the
The IESG has received a request from the Atom Publishing Format and
Protocol WG (atompub) to consider the following document:
- 'The Atom Publishing Protocol '
draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt as a Proposed Standard
By my count, draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt has generated over 250
Robert Sayre schrieb:
The IESG has received a request from the Atom Publishing Format and
Protocol WG (atompub) to consider the following document:
- 'The Atom Publishing Protocol '
draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt as a Proposed Standard
By my count, draft-ietf-atompub-protocol-14.txt
While it is definitely true that there has been a lot of good feedback,
it would still be good to at least start broadening the net and get
feedback from the larger IETF community.
- James
Julian Reschke wrote:
[snip]
+ 0,5.
The document got lots of constructive feedback in the previous
