- Original Message -
From: Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
To: m...@sap.com
Cc: John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com; Thomas Narten
nar...@us.ibm.com; ietf@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:47 PM
Hi Martin,
On 01/25/2013 09:36 PM, Martin Rex wrote:
On 01/27/2013 11:19 AM, t.p. wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Farrell stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
To: m...@sap.com
Cc: John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com; Thomas Narten
nar...@us.ibm.com; ietf@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:47 PM
Hi Martin,
On 1/27/13 12:19 PM, t.p. wrote:
The point that Thomas made and John endorsed is that when we want to
speed things up, our current procedures allow us to do just that. We
do not need a formal process (more complications, more work). And as
John pointed out, having two independent Last Call
- Original Message -
From: Eliot Lear l...@cisco.com
To: John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com
Cc: Thomas Narten nar...@us.ibm.com; adr...@olddog.co.uk;
ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:31 PM
John,
On 1/25/13 4:27 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
a WG can
skip WG LC if they think
