On 8/13/2012 7:14 AM, philip.eard...@bt.com wrote:
Ben,
Thanks for your review.
The right status isn't clear-cut (I think), but when we (Chairs Wes)
discussed it, Info seemed best
* mainly because precedent seems to be that API docs are informational, for
example socket API extensions for
Area Review Team; IETF Discussion List
Subject: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-mptcp-api-05
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any
On Aug 13, 2012, at 9:14 AM, philip.eard...@bt.com wrote:
Ben,
Thanks for your review.
The right status isn't clear-cut (I think), but when we (Chairs Wes)
discussed it, Info seemed best
* mainly because precedent seems to be that API docs are informational, for
example socket API
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq .
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-mptcp-api-05
Reviewer: Ben
