Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile)

2003-03-27 Thread Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Tastes much like a MANET network to me. --On tirsdag, mars 25, 2003 18:03:51 -0500 John Stracke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: S Woodside wrote: In addition I recently had to cope with the hassles of setting up an H.323 connection (with ohphoneX) from behind a firewall at both ends and immediately

Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile)

2003-03-27 Thread John Stracke
Fred Baker wrote: Using it as ad hoc, I think you want to not relay route flaps to your providers. Rather, you want to advertise your prefix (however obtained) to them en mass, and handle the routing issues internally. This may mean providing wired connectivity between your various points of

Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile)

2003-03-27 Thread John Stracke
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote: Tastes much like a MANET network to me. Well, yes. Internally, that's fine; and a MANET community wireless network is a great idea. It's just that, externally, you don't want that ad hoc network exposing its internal structure, or its routing updates will be

Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile)

2003-03-26 Thread John Stracke
S Woodside wrote: In addition I recently had to cope with the hassles of setting up an H.323 connection (with ohphoneX) from behind a firewall at both ends and immediately concluded that people on any kind of wireless mesh that uses NAT are going to be severely limited since they aren't truly

Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile)

2003-03-26 Thread S Woodside
On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 06:03 PM, John Stracke wrote: S Woodside wrote: In addition I recently had to cope with the hassles of setting up an H.323 connection (with ohphoneX) from behind a firewall at both ends and immediately concluded that people on any kind of wireless mesh that

Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile)

2003-03-26 Thread Fred Baker
At 05:50 PM 3/25/2003 -0500, S Woodside wrote: In addition I recently had to cope with the hassles of setting up an H.323 connection (with ohphoneX) from behind a firewall at both ends and immediately concluded that people on any kind of wireless mesh that uses NAT are going to be severely

Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile)

2003-03-26 Thread John Stracke
S Woodside wrote: On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 06:03 PM, John Stracke wrote: proponents want to be able to do massive multihoming, with all participants with external links sharing those links, and all the traffic from the outside finding the shortest way in. I won't say it's impossible,

Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile)

2003-03-26 Thread shogunx
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, S Woodside wrote: On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 06:03 PM, John Stracke wrote: S Woodside wrote: In addition I recently had to cope with the hassles of setting up an H.323 connection (with ohphoneX) from behind a firewall at both ends and immediately concluded