At 01:49 26/06/04, Scott Bradner wrote:
see RFC 2860
Dear Scott and Karl,
thank you for your comments. I explain. I consider the interest of a draft
on the digital intergovernance I do not know yet if I want to undertake
such a task, how, with who, and where. I established a site
(http://intergo
see RFC 2860
Scott
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:
My understanding was that IANA is a neutral, independent, technical
authority
"the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is a function performed by
ICANN".
There is a significant lack of clarity in these matters.
ICANN has a number of legal ar
At 22:39 25/06/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IANA and the ccNSO/ccTLD are two different beasts.
hmmm. They seem now to be both ICANN stuff. This is the point.
ccNSO and company keep track of what NS records are authoritative for what
zones.
Happily not (most of the ccTLD would not like it !!!). Thi
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:05:36 +0200, "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> "the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) is a function performed by
> ICANN".
> http://www.iana.org/procedures/delegation-data.html
> grounds that it may not be still here in two years. The majority of
My understanding was that IANA is a neutral, independent, technical
authority, everyone using the TCP/IP technology could trust, independently
from any operational, political, national, commercial consideration which
are the areas of ICANN, and of other bodies (such as GAC, MINC, ITU, ISOC,
UN,
