Dear IETF,
Sorry for repeating this message, but the proper subject line had not been used.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-otis-dkim-harmful-00
explains why this document should not be supported to proceed as currently
defined.
Feedback on this I-D is welcome.
Regards,
Douglas Otis
I use DKIM via two independent implementations, perl Mail::DKIM to
sign outgoing mail, and C language opendkim to check incoming mail in
the SMTP daemon. It is a mature protocol and the implmentations
interoperate with no problems I've ever seen.
I support promoting 6376 to Internet Standard.
What he said, except that I don't run the perl thing. :-)
+1.
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:52 AM, John Levine jo...@taugh.com wrote:
I use DKIM via two independent implementations, perl Mail::DKIM to
sign outgoing mail, and C language opendkim to check incoming mail in
the SMTP daemon. It is
The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to change the
status of DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures (RFC 6376) to
Internet Standard, from the now-obsolete status of Draft Standard, according
to RFC 6410, Section 2.3, bullet 1. The supporting documentation for the
