John, where is the original of this note? Did it go to the calendar list? If it's on another list, can you point me to it so I (and the list) can see the text of the whole note. Thanks.
"John Stracke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/09/01 18:10
To:
Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 05:16:09PM -0500, Keith Moore wrote:
> > However, many events are actually specified relative to a particular
> > timezone, and timezone offsets occasionally change with little advance
> > warning. As such, this representation may not be sufficient f
Why not just specify that dates/times are RFC2445 compliant?
The calsch WG spent a long time debating these issues.
In addition the date-time format used in RFC2445 is also
ISO-8601 based.
In addition the calsch WG has a plan (don't laugh too hard)
for the usage of time zones. This draft only m
Keith Moore wrote:
>However, many events are actually specified relative to a particular
>timezone, and timezone offsets occasionally change with little advance
>warning. As such, this representation may not be sufficient for
>specifying dates and times of some kinds of events, particularly
>f
