Hi Richard,
I send to the author of an IETF document a message but it was not
answered. I beleive that the question from the community was ignored,
I hope you understand the importance of community questions. Why does
the IETF name its documents RFCs, any one from the community can ask
questions
On 07/06/2013 09:23, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
Thanks for your respond below, AB
Thank you Richard and Abdussalam for reaching agreement
on this. I regard the issue as now closed.
Regards
Stewart Bryant
(speaking as responsible Area Director)
AB,
As Joel pointed out, your questions should have been raised during the
OSPF WG Last Call, which you did not participate in. You
(inappropriately) posted questions on the MANET WG list after the OSPF
WGLC was complete, and several people responded, most of them stating
that RFC 5444 is
I send my request to the editors including questions but no reply from
them to me. The thread [1] raised some issues, which is not mentioned
in the I-D. The message [2] was ignored not answered (this is last
reminder). The message [3] proposes using RFC5444 into this I-D, or
raise the question of
On 6/6/13 3:15 AM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
I send my request to the editors including questions but no reply from
them to me. The thread [1] raised some issues, which is not mentioned
in the I-D. The message [2] was ignored not answered (this is last
reminder). The message [3] proposes using
AB,
As Joel pointed out, your questions should have been raised during the
OSPF WG Last Call, which you did not participate in. You
(inappropriately) posted questions on the MANET WG list after the OSPF
WGLC was complete, and several people responded, most of them stating
that RFC 5444 is
