Hi SM,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:50 AM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
At 00:05 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
As alluded to above, there can be quite a bit of information needed for
an application to be defined beyond the defaults assumed when a name is
registered. There didn't seem
Hi Murray,
At 00:05 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
As alluded to above, there can be quite a bit of information needed
for an application to be defined beyond the defaults assumed when a
name is registered. There didn't seem to be any need to require
such definition to be in an IETF
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:40 AM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
From Section 3.1:
expires: A timestamp indicating a time beyond which the score
reported is likely not to be valid. Expressed as the number of
seconds since January 1, 1970 00:00 UTC. See Section 5 for
At 07:44 15-08-2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Reputation Services WG (repute)
to consider the following document:
- 'A Media Type for Reputation Interchange'
draft-ietf-repute-media-type-10.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next
