Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC

2013-02-11 Thread Magnus Westerlund
On 2013-01-24 23:35, Matt Mathis wrote: Magnus, In behalf of the draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd authors I publicly address the comments in your IETF LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06. In regards to interactions between IW and real time traffic (your points 12 below and echoed in Robert

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC

2013-01-24 Thread Matt Mathis
Magnus, In behalf of the draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd authors I publicly address the comments in your IETF LC review of draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06. In regards to interactions between IW and real time traffic (your points 12 below and echoed in Robert Spark's DISCUSS): By design TCP creates queues

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC

2012-12-06 Thread Magnus Westerlund
Hi, I have reviewed draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06 and have some questions and comments. 1) First of all the experiments done appear to cover the impact on other applications, like measuring the RTT variations when using IW10 compared to IW3. If one is interested in the impact this proposal have on

Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt (Increasing TCP's Initial Window) to Experimental RFC

2012-11-26 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions WG (tcpm) to consider the following document: - 'Increasing TCP's Initial Window' draft-ietf-tcpm-initcwnd-06.txt as Experimental RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final