'; Sandy Wills; IETF General Discussion Mailing List
-- Subject: Re: Binary Choices?
--
-- On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:57:56PM -0500, Gray, Eric wrote:
--
-- Usually, before you can actually seek consensus, you must have an
-- essentially binary choice. It is hard enough to reach consensus
Sam/Sandy,
See below...
--
Eric
--- [SNIP] ---
-- Sandy Unfortunately, there seems to be a religious dogma
-- Sandy among the long-time IETF participants that they never take
-- Sandy votes. All they do is judge rough or smooth concensus, and
-- Sandy that reduces
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:57:56PM -0500, Gray, Eric wrote:
Usually, before you can actually seek consensus, you must have an
essentially binary choice. It is hard enough to reach consensus
on simple choices without turning up the process noise by having a
plethora of possible choices.
I
