At 04:29 PM 08/17/04 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find?
I dunno. I tend to look for the most recent one in
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc-index.txt. The most recent one I find is
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3700.txt.
Or, alternatively, I have a
I dunno. I tend to look for the most recent one in
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc-index.txt. The most recent one I find is
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3700.txt.
If I had to provide a pointer, I would probably use:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html
It is better organized and it provides
At 16:29 17/08/04 +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find?
It seems to me this list deserves top ranking on the first page at
www.ietf.org, but that's certainly not the case. (Try to find it and see
what I mean.)
See:
Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find?
It seems to me this list deserves top ranking on the first page at
www.ietf.org, but that's certainly not the case. (Try to find it and see
what I mean.)
It deserves top ranking on search engines; knowing that
On 19 aug 2004, at 23:23, Joe Touch wrote:
Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find?
It seems to me this list deserves top ranking on the first page at
www.ietf.org
It deserves top ranking on search engines;
So are you saying that we should put our trust into the undisclosed
Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find?
It seems to me this list deserves top ranking on the first page at
www.ietf.org
It deserves top ranking on search engines;
So are you saying that we should put our trust into the undisclosed
algorithms that try to recover
--On 17 August 2004 09:20 -0700 Bob Braden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
* Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find?
*
* It seems to me this list deserves top ranking on the first page at
* www.ietf.org, but that's certainly not
standards,
and what standards are actually deployed, to NEWTRK :-)
But you guys are doing your part - the IETF website just needs to
catch up...
Spencer
From: Ian Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bob Braden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 3:15 AM
Subject: Re: List
On 18-aug-04, at 13:15, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
I think the intent of Iljitsch's note was that the list of IETF
Standards should appear in an obvious place (labeled IETF
Standards) on http://www.ietf.org/ - if the label points to
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html, that's fine.
Right.
There seems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On 17 August 2004 09:20 -0700 Bob Braden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
* Why is the list of internet standards so hard to find? *
* It seems to me this list deserves top ranking on the
Of Glen
Zorn
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 9:31 AM
To: 'Ian Cooper'; 'Bob Braden'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: List of standards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--On 17 August 2004 09:20 -0700 Bob Braden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL
--On Wednesday, 18 August, 2004 10:03 -0700 Thomas Gal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually if you knew what it meant but weren't that familiar
with the place of an RFC(someone who's read 2 specs or
something) you would assume IMHO that an Internet Standard
is NOT a request for comments.
* From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 17 07:43:22 2004
* Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
* Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:29:57 +0200
* X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
*
13 matches
Mail list logo
