John-Luc Bakker wrote:
Dear all,
With regard to the recent discussion regarding RIM's recent IPR
disclosures, I understand the community's concerns regarding the
timeliness of the disclosure. As employees of companies we are bound by
confidentiality obligations and, in addition, cannot always
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
John-Luc, I would like to understand if RIM's recent IPR disclosures
affect general use of application/3gpp-ims+xml, or only its specific use
as described in draft-bakker-sipping-3gpp-ims-xml-body-handling.
Thank you,
Alexey
P.S. I understand that my question might
On 19 Nov 2009, at 19:32, Dan Wing wrote:
Rescinding RFCs-to-be only based on late disclosures may set
a precedence for the future we may not like.
Doing so would provide an incentive for the patent holder to delay disclosure
until after the RFC is issued.
IETF lacks a censure policy for
Rescinding RFCs-to-be only based on late disclosures may set
a precedence for the future we may not like.
Doing so would provide an incentive for the patent holder to delay disclosure
until after the RFC is issued.
IETF lacks a censure policy for such violations. Maybe we need one.
-d
Dear all,
With regard to the recent discussion regarding RIM's recent IPR
disclosures, I understand the community's concerns regarding the
timeliness of the disclosure. As employees of companies we are bound by
confidentiality obligations and, in addition, cannot always control our
company's
